- 金币:
-
- 奖励:
-
- 热心:
-
- 注册时间:
- 2006-7-3
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 2009-3-21 16:38
|
显示全部楼层
June 10, 2008
Bad Day for Stocks in ChinaHere’s a screenshot from my monitor following today’s trading in China. That’s a daily chart of the CSI 300 Index on the bottom and the quote sheets above list the 70 or so most actively traded stocks — if you don’t know which ticker symbols represent which companies, you’re out of luck, sorry.
Note that “limit down” is 10% and that there’s no way to “sell short.” The sheets also have columns which list the 52 week high date and price for each issue, which you may want to study. A lot of folks who came late to this party are deeply underwater.
We have our answer about whether the late April, early May jump was a “sucker’s rally.” Moving to the US markets, with one eye on Lowry’s (abysmal) Buying Power numbers, we can anticipate a similar breakdown in the major averages, yes?
Related:
China’s Stock Markets Have Topped, November 8, 2007
What It Will Look Like When the Chinese Stock Bubble Bursts (Try Try Again), March 30, 2008
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 5:20 pm (utc+8) Comments (7)
A Kind of PoisonVictim or Victor? China’s Olympic Odyssey, by Ian Buruma
“When Communist ideology began to lose its potency in China, after the death of Mao and his successors’ turn towards capitalism, something had to be found to replace it. The Deng era slogan, ‘to get rich is glorious,’ was not quite enough. Chinese rulers have always needed the legitimacy of an official orthodoxy, whether Confucian or Communist, to justify their grip on power. The official post-Maoist answer has been nationalism.
To many Chinese staging the Olympic games has a special significance, because it is part of that promised restoration of Chinese greatness. National pride has to be bolstered by international recognition. So Westerners who use this occasion to criticize Chinese abuses of human rights are not just wrongheaded, but enemies who wish to stop the rise of Great China. And Chinese who support foreign criticisms of China’s human rights record are regarded as traitors.
Aggressive nationalism usually goes together with authoritarian politics. When people have no legitimate means to show dissent, vent their frustrations, express critical opinions in public, and generally take part in politics, nationalism fills the void. As long as they can control it, this suits authoritarian rulers.”
(Buruma has written several good books on Asia, notably “God’s Dust.”)
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 3:41 pm (utc+8) Comments (3)
It’s Like a Locomotive Running Through Your StomachI watched Rounders again last night. The movie is ten years old and holds up pretty well, but if you don’t play poker, you probably never thought it was any good in the first place. It came out way before no-limit Texas Hold’em hit the mainstream. Here are excerpts from a few of the reviewers I read [and my comments in brackets]:
“Though the stakes are always high at the gambling table, they’re pretty low when the film is away from it … John Malkovich shows up, as a Russian mobster. Imagine the danger to the scenery with Malkovich turned loose with a Russian accent.” — Mick LaSalle [the scenes with Malkovich make me laugh out loud, I love Malkovich.]
“John Malkovich has a field day with this role, with a vowel-bending accent that turns ‘O.K.’ into a drawling ‘Ak-yay’ … these gamblers live in a realm where a pair of aces beats a seductive babe every time. Famke Janssen slinks through the film as what would be an attractive alternative to card-playing in any other story.” — Janet Maslin
“Rounders—a vehicle for Matt Damon as a poker-hustling whiz kid—is an unappealing, conventional, and somnolent piece of work. Damon’s latest working-class genius may only feel fully alive when he’s playing cards, but that’s not something one could say for the movie.” — J. Hoberman
“Most gambling movies are dire warnings; this one is a recruiting poster … The movie buys into the seedy glamor of poker, romanticizing a game that essentially consists of exhausted technicians living off brief bursts of adrenaline generated by risking everything they own or can borrow … I am not sure I follow the Professor’s reasoning when he lends his student $10,000 and calls it a mitzvah [LOL] … Rounders sometimes has a noir look but it never has a noir feel, because it’s not about losers (or at least it doesn’t admit it is). It’s essentially a sports picture, in which the talented hero wins, loses, faces disaster, and then is paired off one last time against the champ. For a grimmer and more realistic look at this world, no modern movie has surpassed Karel Reisz’s ‘The Gambler’ (1974).” — Roger Ebert
“It makes one excellent point – you should be what you’re meant to be, and if you know what that is, you’re a lucky man. And if you’ve got the talent, you’re even luckier … (what is that accent Malkovich is doing? Urdu? Uzbeki? Uzi?) [no one knows but it makes everyone laugh] … It’s a movie of character and milieu, both of which it evokes brilliantly. Though it fizzles at the end, you won’t leave it thinking, I need to go somewhere new. You’ve just been somewhere new.” — Stephen Hunter [Hunter is my favorite movie critic by a mile — I almost never disagree with him.]
“John Malkovich chews the scenery as if he hadn’t eaten for a week … the mysteries of the Pyramids will probably have been revealed by the time anyone figures out exactly where Malkovich got his inscrutable Russian accent. ‘Count-eet!’ he barks as he passes a tray of poker chips to Damon early in the movie, and I couldn’t wait for him to show up and open his mouth again. When I heard lines like ‘You haefhv my muneey?’ and ‘Meestair son-of-a-beetch!’ I wasn’t disappointed. Malkovich is occasionally a fine actor but he’s played the beady-eyed bad dude too many times. What he does here isn’t a performance, but a stunt. It’s got to be a tough life, smearing bad accents all over your dialogue like margarine on a soda cracker.” — Stephanie Zacharek [Zacharek is smart and writes well but she’s a girl who doesn’t understand cards (pun intended).]
Here’s the speech given by Joey Knish (brilliantly played by John Turturro) when Mike, broke and desperate, asks him for money:
“‘Stones?’ You little punk. I’m not just playing for the thrill of f*cking victory here. I owe rent, alimony, child support. I play for money. My kids eat. I got stones enough not to chase cards, action, or f*cking pipe dreams of winning the World Series on ESPN. You want me to call some people, try and buy you some time, I will. Place to stay, or the truck. No problem. But about the money, I gotta do this. I gotta say no.”
I recommend the movie, but only to guys who play poker.
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 12:18 pm (utc+8) Comments (8)
June 7, 2008
Gratuitous Cute Chick Pic — June 6, 2008
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 9:03 am (utc+8) Comments (14)
June 6, 2008
A Few Notes on the Chinese ConsumerA few selected excerpts (with my notes in []) from the latest China Consumer Survey (192 pages of pure gold) from CSFB:
Average monthly household after-tax income tier-1 cities (RMB) 5,374 (2004) 6,046 (2005) 5,703 (2006) 7,203 (2007)
Average monthly household after-tax income (RMB) 4,486 (2004 etc) 5,081 5,043 6,180
Median monthly household after-tax income (RMB) 3,770 (2004 etc) 3,940 4,200 4,790
Average monthly after-tax personal income (RMB) 2,013 (2004 etc) 2,121 2,129 2,500
“Experiences in the US and Japan indicate that when per-capita GDP reaches around US$2,000 (in 1951 for the US and 1970 for Japan), private consumption starts to become the key driver of the national economy, reflected in rising private consumption as a percentage of GDP.” [As I’ve said again and again, “per-capita” is the wrong way to try to understand anything in China.]
“only about 20% of urban households own a car” [$200 a barrel crude is a gimme]
Planned budget for new auto purchase (RMB ’000) 131.3 (2004) 146.0 (2005) 128.4 (2006) 166.8 (2007)
Average spending per restaurant meal (RMB) 49.9 (2004 etc) 51.1 51.1 56.5
Planned budget for handsets current owners (RMB) 2,138 (2004 etc) 2,202 2,162 2,138 [that’s a lot of money, even if there’s no growth (normal tech price deflation)]
Total monthly spending on online games (RMB) - 68.7 (2005 etc) 59.2 65.2 [not a category in 2004]
Budget for overseas travel in next year (RMB) 14,760 (2004 etc) 16,438 13,532 15,852 [this is why you *must* own CTRP]
“respondents with college or above educations expect 26% income growth” [great expectations]
“We think that the official data is underestimating the income of Chinese residents, mainly due to under-reporting of income by the high-income group to official statistical agencies.” [massive tax evasion in China, no collection system outside of multinationals (where the tax collection is *extremely* efficient :) )]
“Which mobile carriers are you using?” 76% Total domination by China Mobile (0941.HK) [yes, I use China Mobile]
“Which Chinese brands of sports clothing or sports shoes have you bought?” 50% Li Ning dominates among domestic brands (2331.HK) [I remember well the incredulity when I first asked ‘who in god’s name is Li Ning?’]
“Which is your favourite online game?” 20% QQ game zone (0700.HK)
“Which instant messaging software do you use most frequently?” QQ (again) 47% [though in my experience here in Beijing, MSN has huge share]
“Which blog site do you use most frequently?” 23% Sina (SINA (Nasdaq))
“Which search engine do you use most frequently?” 61% Baidu (BIDU (Nasdaq)) [I’m a Google man myself but they have a tough row to hoe here.]
“Which portal do you use most frequently?” Sina and Sohu dominate [I can’t bear to visit these because of the blinky flashies and incredibly dense text, but the locals are unphased by the horrific design.]
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 11:14 am (utc+8) Comments (6)
June 5, 2008
Yield Curve for Chinese Sovereign DebtHere’s the yield curve for Chinese government bonds. I don’t get it because I think the last time I was in my local bank, the one-year deposit rate they were offering was around 4.14%, which is just below what the ten-year Treasury is yielding? I don’t un-ner-stan (as usual). I guess the Treasury is sale-able whereas you’re locked-in at the bank (must be a penalty for early withdrawal)? Typically ignorant, rambling blog post — my specialty!
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 2:54 pm (utc+8) Comments (6)
June 4, 2008
Lousy Lehman’s Delicious Lunchtime LullHere’s the 15-minute chart for Lehman (LEH) over the last several days. I was fast asleep during all this trading, but that doesn’t mean I can’t engage in a little after-the-fact analysis like the best 53-cent-a-day gurus (this is an inside joke).
LEH gave dummies a nice spot to get short during the lunchtime lull yesterday. Like Fibonacci, the Sequential can be useful for price projection (top secret method though, don’t ask me for details), and in this case was pointing to a sub-$30 price off the 15-minute chart.
Interesting to learn that Lehman themselves were in the market on Tuesday buying back their stock. Hey, if you’re going to dilute the common shareholders’ equity to the tune of several billion more dollars, what’s the matter with a little intervention to keep up appearances?
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 4:15 pm (utc+8) Comments (13)
Lehman Short — Swing and a MissThe Box was looking at Lehman (LEH) from the short side back in April and subscribers received this idea for April 28:
The trade didn’t trigger or fill so it was discarded. The May 2 bar would have taken us out for a loss anyway (though getting short beneath that reversal bar at $46.51 would have been perfect). In any event, I just wanted to show that the Box’s thinking is often good… but timing is everything and being “close” doesn’t mean a damn.
<DIV class=cent .
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 8:45 am (utc+8) Comments (6)
June 3, 2008
Herbie Sandler, Very Keen Observer of the MarketA little blast from the past, from May 2006 … fun reading in light of the purging of G. Kennedy Thompson [emphasis mine]:
“‘We believe this combination of our two companies, both known for exceptional customer service and pristine credit quality, will generate superior long-term growth in earnings per share,’ said Ken Thompson, Wachovia chairman and chief executive officer, who noted that Golden West’s World Savings Bank is the nation’s only standalone savings and loan with a ‘AA’ debt rating. ‘For four decades, Golden West has taken industry-wide challenges in stride and maintained a singular focus as a risk-averse residential mortgage portfolio lender. [I believe their loan portfolio was 99% option ARMs with a huge concentration in California.] The result is an astonishing 25-year track record of 17 percent compound annual growth in earnings per share and virtually no credit losses realized even in the toughest year in its history.’
Herbert M. Sandler, Golden West chairman and chief executive officer, commented, ‘I’ve been a keen observer of the market and the mortgage and banking industries for nearly 40 years. Wachovia is the company we selected to entrust with our legacy as one of the nation’s most admired and trusted financial institutions. We share the same values of operating with integrity, putting customers first and encouraging teamwork.’”
I recall that at the time many people believed that a shrewd old operator like Herbie Sandler was selling out at the top, making a perfectly-timed exit — his Pick-a-Payout was a thing of beauty. (The Golden West sale could be studied together with Sammy Zell’s similarly brilliant sale of EOP to those dummies at Blackstone.) In matters of money, are you going to place your bets on someone named G. Kennedy or someone named Herbie? (That’s right, always the latter.)
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 11:36 am (utc+8) Comments (1)
Regional Bank (KRE) Short Idea– Animated EditionThought I’d try an experiment with these animated charts … here’s a recent short idea from the Box — the lead up to the set-up and the aftermath. Let me know if you like this kind of thing, how I can improve it, make it more instructive, etc. I’ll make more of them if people like them.
Related: Will the Regional Banks Break to New Lows? (May 8, 2008)
time saved
time saved
Cat: | Time: 9:11 am (utc+8) Comments (22)
« Previous Page• Next Page » |
|
|