- 金币:
-
- 奖励:
-
- 热心:
-
- 注册时间:
- 2004-11-25
|
|
Originally posted by thingdi at 2005-2-28 14:29
//DiNapoli MACD
A=(EMA(C,8.3896)-EMA(C,17.5185));
Sig=EMA(A,9.0503);
UpWard = BarsSince(A < Sig);
DnWard = BarsSince(A > Sig);
TrendBarCount = 2;
for( i = 0; i < BarCount; i++ )
...
I agree----backbone! But we don't need to be perfect, my friend, applying FibNodes acrossing timeframes is his bone, but even most advance website doesn't offer this. For we fibs, one FibNodes one timeframe is already a lurxery treatment, we don't even need FibNodes automatic updating following the market, we do it manually!
The specialty of FibNodes is, comparing to Fibonacci, in any market swing, Fibonacci has one low/high matches one high/low, while FibNodes has one low/high(Foucus Number) matches several highs/lows(Reaction Number) show as following graph. In another word, in a market swing(say up trend), there's a Foucus Number(High), and there are several Reaction Numbers(lower lows) down to the bottom where the swing started. You'll get a suit of retracment levels(.382 and .618 only) for each Reaction Number and the same Foucus Number. If you have 10 Reaction Number, you'll get 10 suit of retracement levels. The 10 suit of levels disply at the same place so that you can see the confluence and agreement(Areas where retracement levels close to eachother).
I have no idea about what does this mean in computer. Perhaps we asked too much...anyway, thanks very much for looking into this! |
|
|
楼主
发表于 2005-2-28 18:12
