搜索
楼主: hefeiddd

一个笨蛋的股指交易记录-------地狱级炒手

  [复制链接]
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 18:59 | 显示全部楼层
Dow Forms Symmetrical Triange - Break Ahead?
August 1st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The Dow Jones average appears to be currently in the process of forming a symmetrical triangle at the moment.  What does that mean and what might it mean for the future?
Dow Jones Daily Chart:

We can expect price consolidation following a large volatility move, as we have just witnessed (Dow moving from 13,000 to 10,800 in three months).  Price structure is merely consolidating (digesting) the movement that took place so swiftly without hesitation.
As such, aggressive traders can perhaps trade off the narrowing price extremes of the potential pattern, and conservative traders can wait for the eventual (potential) break of this classic pattern, and trade in the direction of the breakout.
The “measuring implication” or price projection will be in the neighborhood of 1,600 Dow Points, which is roughly equal to the height of the triangle (which is approximate to the first price swing that formed the triangle).  While it’s impossible to know that a triangle is forming on the first or second swing, by the fourth or fifth swing, the pattern ought to be clear to you.
Momentum (oscillator) is also consolidating, right along with price.  Be especially aware if the momentum oscillator breaks its channels (blue) prior to price.  Also, be sure to ignore moving averages in the formation of this pattern - notice how price is absolutely disrespecting the flattened 20 day EMA.
Let’s zoom in a little and view this developing triangle on a smaller timeframe.
Dow Jones 30-minute chart:

This chart also shows good examples of key momentum divergences, including a relatively rare ‘flat-line’ divergence and multi-swing divergence.
If a symmetrical triangle truly is forming, the next expected move would be a test of the upper descending trendline around 11,500 (250 points away).  Should price break 11,250, it would either invalidate the pattern or be the start of the break.  I suspect we’ll at least get a little more upward movement prior to any break, though, as classic technical analysis states that price is expected to break 67% to 75% prior to the apex (meeting point) of the triangle and we’re not there yet.
Continue to watch the volatility measures and indicators, as well as range expansion/contraction indicators (such as standard deviation and Bollinger Bands) for clues of extreme range contraction, and seek to play a breakout when and if it occurs.
3 Comments | add comment


Russell 2000 Trapped - Showing Relative Strength
August 1st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The Russell 2000 (Small-Cap) Index is currently trapped beneath is key average, hinting that a potential break may be in store.  Also, the index is showing strong relative strength to the Dow, S&P, and NASDAQ, which could be a good sign for the larger cap markets.  Let’s look.
Russell 2000 Index Daily:

The Russell (here-on as $RUT) caught my attention recently, when the S&P, NAS, and Dow all made clearly lower lows in July… but the Russell (mostly comprised of ’small-cap’ companies) formed a higher low, which is the first step in a potential trend change.  Not to my surprise, the RUT is showing strong relative strength to the other indexes (chart of S&P below).
At the moment, the index has created a new momentum high (but not a new price high) and is stagnating (consolidating) in a range between its key 20 and 50 period EMAs and the falling 200 day SMA.  Once price convincingly breaks one of these areas, a new continuation price swing may lead to a round of profits for those who join the breakout side.
Support comes in around index value 700 and resistance comes in around value 720.  Notice that a small symmetrical triangle is forming (not drawn).  The break of the triangle could lead to a quick trend move, especially if price pierces its key moving averages.
Speaking of relative strength, let’s compare the Russell to the S&P 500:
Russell to S&P Relative Strength:

Earlier this year, the S&P outperformed the Russell, but since June, small caps as a whole have outperformed larger cap issues.  The “Blue Line” for the Russell overtook the “Black Line” for the S&P at this time, which is evidenced by the ratio chart in the bottom panel.  With relative strength rising, one could have hedged long the Russell and short the S&P and profited from that balanced hedge.  Or, one could have traded more aggressively in small-cap stocks.
Although I don’t discuss it much on the blog, you should always pay attention to relative strength relationships and assess whether the RS Line (one security divided by another or an index) is rising or falling.  Relative strength tends to be a sustained relationship, and often RS shifts (changes) will occur prior to actual price shifts, so it’s important to keep an eye on this ‘indicator.’
We’ve made it through June and July, and August is sort of a transition month in the market so it will be interesting to see if a clear direction emerges, or at least if volatility calms down a bit - this has been a much more active summer than expected.
1 Comment | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:00 | 显示全部楼层
Gold’s Make or Break Zone Coming Up
July 31st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Gold prices have taken a downward move which may have surprised many traders.  A ‘make or break’ moment (or zone) is in the works, the resolution of which could give us a significant clue about gold’s next move.  Let’s see it.
Gold Daily Chart:

Price has formed a three-month triangle consolidation pattern, which resolved with an upward break (and target of $1,000), and renewed bullish sentiment took over.  Price fell just shy of this target, and from making new highs, and is now in a potential ‘roll-over’ pattern.  What’s striking (to me) in the chart is the mini bear flag (not shown) which formed abruptly which culminated in two dojis at the (now) falling 20 period EMA.  It was almost as if the brief up-rally at the end of July was over before it started.
A doji at resistance following a momentum move (notice the new momentum low in July) is often a wonderful place to enter a trade - if you were quick enough to realize this opportunity (I wasn’t).
There appears to be almost a ‘magnet’ at the $890 to $895 per share level, which culminates in the apex of the triangle pattern and the rising 200 day moving average.  However, price is currently sitting directly at support via the 20 week EMA.  Will it hold?
Weekly Chart:

Price has not respected this average throughout 2008, so I’m not sure it will do so again (by ‘respect,’ I mean ‘find support’).  Nevertheless, this is a concern (temporarily) for current gold bears.  Should price break through this level AND the $890 level as construed on the daily chart, the next ‘line of support’ (or bull/bear battle) will take place at the 50 week EMA, which currently stands at $860.95. I put a “?” there to indicate whether or not we get to this level and if it will hold.
According to the ‘pure price method’ on the weekly chart, price has formed a lower (swing) low and a lower (swing high).  Should price take out the lows of 2008 (around $850), then we would officially classify the weekly chart as being in a downtrend.  We’re not there yet, but are close.  I remain in an official ‘holding pattern’ and in a ‘wait and see’ pattern to see if these levels I mentioned hold.
If they do hold (support), then odds favor higher prices yet to come as the bears surrender.  If they fail to hold (price breaks beneath $900 and especially $890), then expect a test of $850 and potentially beyond (to the downside).
Right now, as I interpret it technically (from the chart perspective) price hinges between these zones, and it will be up to supply and demand (and investor psychology) to determine the victor.  It would likely be wise to join the winning side and trade in that direction once this indecision is over.
1 Comment | add comment


Recent Market Club Trading Signals in Crude Oil
July 31st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Adam Hewison released a brief info-movie today showing some of the recent proprietary trading signals in the crude oil market - starting with a sell signal and moving to a recent buy signal.
The video asks “Is the Move in Crude Oil Over” and can be viewed from the previous link.  What interesting is that Hewison actually teaches some of the Market Club technique for free in the video, in terms of how to set-up trades by taking into account the higher time frame structure and how to time trades on daily or lower timeframes.
For example, Market Club’s weekly chart signaled a ’sell’ at $135.08 per barrel while the daily chart signal actually (of course) preceded this signal and got you out (or short) a little earlier at $137.25 (and is currently showing a buy signal while the weekly chart is not).
Market Club’s current buy signal - based on undisclosed indicator combinations - transpired at $125.19.
I did think this was a very helpful example of confirming some of the methods taught and referenced in the Market Club material and trading site, which you can join and learn the basics and more advanced techniques from the popular and growing Market Club site.
Hewison frequently posts videos of Apple Inc (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Gold prices, and many other markets that are in the media spotlight at the moment, which keeps you right on pace in a central location with what’s happening right now.
You can also use the many stock and futures market scanning capabilities to develop your own watchlist and trading candidates for use in your own trading plan.
No Comments | add comment



Major Intermarket Relationships Shifting
July 30th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

If you’ve been keeping an eye on the major news or trends in the major markets, you may have noticed a not-so subtle shift that’s clearly taken place.  Let’s see what that shift is and what it might mean for the future.
First, let’s look at the following markets and their performance since the start of 2008:  S&P 500 (blue), Crude Oil (black), Gold (gold/yellow), 10 Year Treasury Yields (Brown), and the US Dollar Index (green)

The price of crude oil skews all other markets on this chart, and without it we may have a clearer relative picture, but the price of a barrel of oil has been so important to the broader markets that we can’t logically skip it.
You can view the chart for more insights at your leisure, but I want to focus on what’s happened since the blue dotted line in mid-July for the remainder of this post.
Oil peaked, the stock market bottomed, gold (temporarily) peaked, and the direction of the US Dollar and yields began to rise.
We can expect this from our collective understanding of intermarket relationships (as taught by Martin Pring, John Murphy, and many others).
A strong dollar is bad for commodities.
Rising yields (falling bond prices) boost the US Dollar Index.
In this environment, the stock market would prefer commodity prices to fall, and the dollar to strengthen, thus it is getting a boost.

It’s difficult to know what caused what (the proverbial “chicken or the egg”) but it’s just as important to know what’s happening and what might be in store.  It’s also important to determine whether this current shift is a true reversal or a mere correction in the larger trends - it could be too early to tell, but if it is truly to be a reversal, now would be the time to keep your eyes open to the possibility that broader market trends may be shifting - at least for the time being.
Now, let’s zoom in on this shift and look at price performance since May 2008:

The shift becomes abundantly clear here.  Around July 14th, “everything changed” (at least for the moment.  Crude and Gold (commodities) plunged, the Stock Market eeked out a temporary bottom, and the direction of the 10 Year Yield and the US Dollar changed abruptly - all playing out to the broader script of intermarket expectations.
I like to envision these markets as a broader, inter-related game of chess (sometimes even 3-D chess), where moves in one market will directly affect another market.  It’s often difficult to discern the causes, but once a piece is in action, one can properly anticipate the current and potentially future moves in subsequent markets.  One can also use the structure for confirmation/non-confirmation (to see if what’s happening in one market is in line with expectations).
Do your own analysis on these markets to see if what we’re witnessing is a significant change, or just a retracement against strong, established, underlying trends - time will tell.  Do be aware that an asset allocation position shift may be ahead.
4 Comments | add comment



TA Legend Martin Pring turns Bullish on US Equities
July 30th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Martin Pring, one of the most well-known and respected market technicians of our time, recently published a brief quarterly report which outlined his case for renewed, current optimism on the US Equity Market.
Entitled “Time to be Bullish” (link opens as a .pdf file), Martin outlines the four major reasons why he believes - from his detailed analysis - that a potential new bull market is underway for the stock market.
A little background - Pring teaches that markets travel in cycles, such that the Bond Market will lead the Stock Market, which then leads the Commodity market.  The economy itself is a coincident indicator to the commodity markets, and the bond and stock markets anticipate economic conditions in the future, and thus lead the economy.  As such, he now believes that the bond and stock markets have already priced in (anticipated) the negative news we are seeing currently and are (potentially) preparing themselves to discount this news and rally.
Pring lists the following four reasons “to be optimistic today”:
1.  Low Consumer Confidence equals Profits Ahead
2.  Bull Markets Always Follow Bear Markets
3.  Lower Oil Prices [are] Ahead
4.  Record Cash Levels on the Sidelines

Many of those premises may be hard to accept in the current environment, and Mr. Pring is indeed making bold statements, but let us not forget how many years of experience and how many economic cycles he has studied and lived through.  Let us also not forget that he authored the seminal ‘textbook’ Technical Analysis Explained, which is required reading for Levels I and II of the Chartered Market Technican’s educational materials for the examination.
The entire article is only four pages long, and you can peruse further quarterly statements by the Pring/Turner Investment Group at their “Quarterly Newsletters” page (all of which are in .pdf format).
For deeper analytical research, you may view Martin’s lengthy free movie report “Why Commodity Prices are in the Process of Peaking” at his personal website.  I have met and attended three conferences with Martin and can attest to his depth of knowledge of financial and economic markets - when he speaks, it is often a great idea to listen or at least take his research into serious consideration.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:01 | 显示全部楼层
Yet Another Trend Day in the Market - Trading Tactics
July 29th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Surprisingly (at least to me), the market gave us yet another trend day, though - again - it was not your classic trend day.  Let’s continue to study each trend day occurrence for clues about how to trade them for maximum profit.
DIA 5-minute chart:

Typically, trend days follow range-bound, consolidation days - this was not the case.  Typically, trend days begin with a large volatility gap - this also was not the case.
Price did begin the day rather standardly before launching into a momentum move up, making new momentum highs and creating a bullish cross in the 20 and 50 period moving averages.  Still, while odds increased for a trend day, one still could not classify the structure as such at this point.
With a new price and momentum high, one should be looking to buy the first retracement to the key 20 period EMA, which occurred just before noon.  Price almost immediately satisfied those ‘retracement’ trades but then paused, creating yet another pullback to the key moving average, and setting up a potential new entry.
Here’s where things got sticky for the day.
I always advocate - with my students and in my personal trading - that once you suspect a trend day is unfolding, place a core trade immediately and place your stop beneath the 50 period EMA.  Also, any ’scalp’ or swing trades should often place a stop beneath this key average as well (such as the impulse buy trade mentioned earlier).
What happened?  A classic “Rinse and Run” or - as I affectionately call them - “F-You” trades (which stands of course for “Fade You” or “Flush You [out]” - or just “Rinse”) occurred, snatching away your long position, taking your well-placed stop-loss with you.  That’s ok - you need to trade with stops.  The hard part about these occurrences is realizing that you made the right move - it’s not necessarily about making the most money or not getting stopped out - it’s about applying consistent metrics and techniques with edge as you understand it, and letting the edge (strategy) play out over dozens and hundreds of trades.
This time, a well-placed trade and well-placed stop was hit… and price skyrocketed higher without you on board.  I try to make it a practice to re-enter following these patterns, because many traders are upset and will likely begin chasing the market higher.  Also, many large volatility moves are preceded by those unpredictable, nasty “Rinse” situations.
Enough about that - price did launch higher, and at this time you should have all the confidence you need to believe the rest of the day should unfold as a trend day.  Lo and behold, the price - after the momentum move - formed a downdraft against you, even forming a mini-bear flag (if you were quick enough to play it - I was not) and found support at the 200 period SMA.
The final move was a strong, uninterrupted push (swing) into the close, which completed the ‘trend day’ structure.  Remember, if it truly will be a trend day, price will open at or near the lows and then close at or near the highs - thus any trade entered in the direction of the trend will be profitable into the close regardless of initial location (provided you don’t try to enter at the end of the day).
Oh, one final note - during trend days, it’s best to focus on moving average for support and resistance, and not be concerned with oscillators such as the RSI, stochastics, or even standard/modified MACD indicators.
Study each trend day and annotate it such that you understand it (utilizing the TICK, TRIN, Breadth, etc) so you can be more profitable when the next opportunity arises.
3 Comments | add comment


Current Dow Overview
July 29th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Let’s take a quick moment as we begin this Tuesday to view the Daily Structure of the Dow Jones Industrial Average for possible clues of the action ahead.
Dow Jones Daily:

Looking backwards first, we note the pronounced, multi-swing negative momentum divergence - as well as price testing resistance via the 200 day SMA - preceded the recent downward plunge in the market.  Given that the broader trend is down, this should not have come as a surprise.  What was surprising - to me at least - was just how overextended price became, and how it seemed a ‘bounce’ was forming earlier.
The bounce finally came, which is again classified as a “Bear Market Rally” or counter-trend retracement, and as such, prices often move violently against the trend (typically as shorts cover and bottom-fishers and long-term value players emerge).  Risk was still high to the downside via the overall structure, and price could reverse at any point, which it did, and gave us two trend days down in the last three trading sessions.
A positive momentum divergence, as well as a large volume ’surge’ preceded the recent sharp rally, which - as of this morning - has only retraced the key Fibonacci 38.2% retracement and found resistance via the Bollinger Band, just shy of the clearly falling 50 day EMA.
The trend is still down and we are still experiencing a dominant (current) swing in the direction of the trend.  Should price indeed form a higher swing low at this point, we would have additional confidence that a trend reversal could be in the works (a trend reversal is a three-step process), but until that happens, we will have to assume that the pathway of least resistance, and greater probabilities, is down, perhaps again testing the Dow 11,000 or lower.
All bets are off to the long-side should price make a new low for the year.  It’s probably best to cease trying to call a bottom in this type of market anyway.
Consider joining the Market Club for daily analysis, videos, scans, commentary, and signals if you have not done so already.
Remain on guard both long and short.
No Comments | add comment



Yet Another Trend Day Down
July 28th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The market gave us yet another trend-style day down today, washing away most if not all bullish hopes for an extended counter-rally recovery.  Let’s view the intraday charts to see what opportunities were in store for nimble and aware traders, who were able to take advantage of the trend structure today.
DIA 5-minute chart:

Most trend days begin with two common characteristics:
A low-range day prior (usually a NR7 or a doji pattern)
A (relatively) large opening gap
The last two trend days (the last was the previous Thursday) had slight but not ultra-range contraction, but neither began with a large opening gap.  In fact, both were ‘creeping’ trends, which tend to be the most insidious, hidden style of trend days.  Lack of an opening gap can lull us into complacency as we fail to recognize the potential for the trend day to unfold.  It’s far easier to anticipate a large intrday trend day move if the initial gap occurs (and especially if there’s some sort of major news announcement).
Barring that, we tend to be in ‘countertrend’ or ‘fade’ moves, and deploying such tactics on trend days can be devastating to an account, especially if done in the futures market or on leverage.
Nevertheless, let’s look at today’s structure for trade opportunities and clues.
The day started relatively ‘normal’ and then price broke beneath Friday’s close not necessarily with fanfare or high volume.  Price even was mysterious enough to provide dojis and hammers that lured some of us in to ‘buy long’ anticipating a counter-swing, which led to stop-losses (which likely led to further selling as the ‘bears’ dominated the session almost from open to close).
The only true ‘counter-trend’ move, or retracement, came at noon, and it was a flat-line (correction by time) swing, which precluded further selling pressure ahead.  Sure enough, when price ‘retraced’ back to its 20 period EMA and formed three tight-range doji candles, that was your clearest entry signal for a range expansion move and the position I deem the “highest probability” short of the day.
Price expanded out of this consolidation on to new lows for the day.  If you missed this quick expansion, there wasn’t much left to obtain, as price once again consolidated, formed a positive momentum  divergence… and then plunged lower into the close, invalidating the divergence signal.
Nevertheless, once you recognize that a trend day is forming (or has higher odds of developing than not), you need to enter (in this case short) at that moment and not try to ‘play cute’ with entries.  If it indeed IS a true trend day, price will close on or at the lows, so any initial trade location will (likely) be profitable.  You should place your stop above the 50 period EMA and trail down to the close - exit at the close.
The SPY (S&P 500) looked similar, although price did form deeper and more stable ’swings’ that allowed for more profit.
SPY 5-minute chart:

Notice the bear flag into the close.  Once the trend day was established, price never threatened the 50 period EMA.  The ‘flag’ part of the bear flag here was another high probability entry.  Also, don’t be fooled psychologically by thinking “price can’t go any lower so I really shouldn’t enter short here” because many times price that gets extended - especially into the close - will continue to get over-extended, robbing profits from those who attempted to stand in its way.
Mark today’s action up as a “trend day” and download your charts and annotate them to learn lessons when the next potential trend day is upon us.
No Comments | add comment



BUD Stairsteps to Profit - Random Walk?
July 28th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Anheuser Busch (BUD) has been in the news prominently as the takeover candidate of ImBev (buy-out), and the stock has responded positively in a unique ’stair-step’ pattern which is worth examination.  Let’s see what we mean.
BUD Daily Chart:

After rumors were announced earlier this year, the stock began to respond positively to the potential of being a take-over candidate - now with the news well-confirmed, BUD has reached record levels prior to the deal being complete.
What’s interesting is the relatively rhythmic, stable price ‘jumps’ from one level to the next.  This stock would be what I, personally, would expect if the “Random Walk” Hypothesis was 100% correct - that stock prices are random and news is filtered into the price immediately as it is released, giving investors nothing more than a random chance for profits.
Of course, we as traders seek profit through disproving this hypothesis, or squeaking through its holes, particularly through emotional price overreactions and situations (trade set-ups) with ‘edge’ but nevertheless, I thought it was interesting to see this pattern and wanted to highlight its occurrence.  We would expect to see far more situations like this (gaps and pauses/flat prices) were the theory 100% correct.
Moving on from the brief Random Walk thoughts, let’s look at the Weekly chart of BUD, which shows just how far this stock has risen in 2008:
BUD Weekly Chart:

A slight positive momentum divergence, as well as support coming in from the 200 week moving average preceded this rampant run-up, but it was not the technicals (price chart) at all that did the run-up - it was rumors, speculation, then confirmation which did so, as is the case many times with takeover candidates.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:02 | 显示全部楼层
Top and Bottom 10 Stocks by ATR Percentage: Volatility
July 27th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Recently, I posted the Top 10 and Bottom 10 Stocks in the S&P 500 average by daily Average True Range.  Now, let’s look at the top and bottom stocks by factor of percentage of the ATR to the recent close - stocks with a higher percentage will be more volatile than those with lower percentages, and absolute ATR dollar value says little in terms of ranking stocks.  Let’s get more precise.
Steven Geringer of the Trade Performance website advised me to look into a factor of percentages when comparing ATR values, as this would give a more accurate reading of volatility than the pure ATR value itself - he’s right.  By the way, please check out the Trade Performance Website for active trader software that calculates a vast array of essential trading metrics that can help guide you to assess your results and measure your trading progress.
Steven provided the following code to sort stocks:
ATRPercent= (ATR(10)/EMA(Close,10))*100
This would be the 10 day ATR value then divided by the 10 day exponential moving average, all of which is then multipled by 100 to arrive at a percentage.
In TradeStation, Steven’s formula code would be (my coding interpretation here):
inputs:
ATR( 10 ),
Length ( 10 );

Value1 = (AvgTrueRange( ATR )/XAverage(Close, Length))*100 ;
Plot1( Value1, “ATRPercent” ) ;

For this chart, I used the following code which compares the 14 day Average True Range value to the most recent close; Steven’s formula would be more informative, especially if there was a recent price shock - moving averages would filter out extreme events better than viewing the recent close.
ATRPercent = (ATR(14)/last)*100
Specifically, the TradeStation code I used is the following:
inputs:
ATR( 14 );

Value1 = (AvgTrueRange( ATR )/last)*100 ;
Plot1( Value1, “ATRPercent” ) ;

Let’s look at the results:
Top 10:

When using the last close method, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae rise to the top of the list with the current 14 day ATR value being over 30% of the most recent close!  One can see how this finding can be useful for volatility considerations - while these clearly don’t offer the wild price swings of CME or GOOG, these stocks have very high daily fluctuations as a percentage of their price action.
Washington Mutual (WM) registers as #3 on the list, and Regions Financial (RF) registers as #8 - clearly financial stocks have been very volatile as of late.
Using this method, Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) - which has the highest S&P ATR value - registers at #84 in this ranking (with a daily percentage of 6.94%) and Google - #2 on the prior list - registers at #239 with a daily ATR percentage of 4.49%.
Which stocks have the smallest percent?
Bottom 10:

Perhaps surprisingly, these stocks have relatively moderate to high price values (ranging from $24 to $78), yet have very low daily Average True Range readings, thus resulting in a low percentage.  Wrigley (WWY), which has a price value of almost $79, actually has the second lowest percentage, as its ATR value registers at $0.42.
Consider using either of these formulas to compare and rank stocks based on their volatility ranking as a function of Average True Range to daily close or 10 period EMA price.
(Thank you to Steven Geringer for this idea and for providing the forumla)
No Comments | add comment


Phases of a Bear Market
July 27th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Mish at “Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis” (an excellent site) recently detailed for us the “Ten Bear Market Phases” which is certainly worth a read and further study - or memorization.
I’ve been wanting to articulate something similar to these phases, but I tip my hat to Mish for compiling such a great and informative list, with brief explanations of each phase.
He lists the stages as follows:
1. A huge buy the dip mentality sets in during the initial decline.
2. Moderate concern sets in when buy the dip stops working.
3. Initial panic.
4. Numerous bottom calls are made, all wrong.
5. Search for the guilty.
6. Punishment of the innocent.
7. More panic.
8. Lawsuits fly.
9. Regulatory power is given to those most responsible for spiking the punch bowl.
10. Congress gets in the act and makes things worse

With visualization, and a cursory look-back over the last year (beginning around mid-2007), we can see these steps playing out in text-book fashion, from the overextended run-up leading to the top in October 2008 to the current governmental intervention, which President George Bush - without fanfare - will sign soon (in terms of the Housing rescue and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac funding).
What has irritated me as we have progressed through these phases is the willingness of the public and TV Media to fall right in lock-step with such repetitive phases, almost as if they can’t help it.
Once the market topped (admittedly, we don’t know a true top until it has formed), many commentators (including Jim Cramer) were advocating the end of 2007 fall as a wonderful ‘buy the dip’ philosophy which continued into the early part of 2008.  Such “buy the dip” prognostications worked initially, but never once did a rally overtake its predecesor’s high (yes there was a rally off the January ‘bottom’ and the March ‘bottom’ but the market is lower now than both bottoms).
One felt the concern pick up as prices made new lows in June, but the concern did not (yet) turn into panic, perhaps until the Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae and collapse of IndyMac - although panic swept the street (or at least part of Main Street) at that time, that instance served as yet another temporary ‘bottom.’
Speaking of bottoms, what irritates me most when the market indexes have clearly and distinctly turned down (in terms of trend) is these same “buy the dip” forecasters are expounding their wisdom to get back in and buy because the bottom is here at last!  Such ‘wisdom’ is misleading at best to the public and malicious at worst.
One cannot call the true bottom until after it has occurred - anything else would be bucking the trend that has now clearly been established.  In a bear market, there is no support, though there are clear retracements which ar nothing more than counter-trend rallies that provide excellent opportunities to get short, not long.
Nevertheless, the true bottom will not be felt until panic overtakes, and these same market prognosticators abandon their “buy the dip” and “this is the bottom” mentality.  Often, bottoms form when everyone are convinced beyond a doubt that they will NOT form, and that the market will continue to fall indefinitely - or there will be a collapse of the economy as we know it or some other emotional panic situation.
Look for a bottom and for the market to stabilize once people stop trying to call a bottom and accept that the bear is here to stay - ironically, that will likely be when the bear ends.
No Comments | add comment



Which Stocks Have the Highest and Lowest ATR?
July 25th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Knowing the Average True Range (ATR) value of a stock for a given period can be immensely helpful for you in developing trading candidates and risk-management strategies.  What are the Top Ten and Bottom Ten ATR values for stocks in the S&P 500 Index?
The Average True Range Indicator tells us the ‘average’ price movement of the last 14 days (default), which lets us know the range to expect, and also gives us a measure of volatility.  Volatility can equal risk for traders, but it can also signal plenty of opportunity for day-traders.
Let’s look at the 14 period daily ATR values (data created and sorted with TradeStation’s RadarScreen):
Top Ten ATR Values:

Before I conducted this quick test/scan, I expected Google (GOOG) to top out the stocks for the most volatilite (or have the largest daily range).  I was wrong; in fact, Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) topped Google by almost $4.00 per day!
My next thought was that Apple would be in the Top 5, but actually, AAPL barely squeaked into the Top 10 list, trailing Goldman Sachs (GS), Mastercard (MC) and the Washington Post (WPO - did you know it traded aboe $600 per share?).
Folks, if you are eager equity day-traders, here is your top-ten ’scalping’ list.  Capturing a $1 move with 1,000 shares (considered a ‘plunge’ position) will net you - surprise - $1,000.  That may be a lofty goal to reach, but meeting it could be easier if you play the swings in these stocks.
What stocks should day-traders absolutely avoid?
Bottom Ten ATR Values:

To be fair, I did not filter out stocks priced beneath $20 - doing so would have wiped away almost all of these stocks.
Another bonus tidbit of information is that 109 stocks in the S&P 500 Index currently trade less than $20 per share (that’s 22% of the total index).
Only 16 stocks (a mere 3%) trade greater than $100 per share (based on a closing price of July 25, 2008).
Thus, roughly 75% of all S&P stocks are between $20 and $100.
The Average True Range indicator can be useful in determining trading candidates, determining stop-loss levels (usually a function of the ATR, such as place a stop two times the value of the current ATR), determining profit targets (also a function of the ATR), or assessing volatility and range expansion.
4 Comments | add comment



Dow Completes Weekly Measured Move
July 25th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The Dow Jones Industrial Index completed a large-scale “measured move” pattern last week, which culminated with a large momentum bounce (confirmed counter-trend rally) which led us to this week’s action, which found resistance and is retracing part of the counterswing move.  If all that sounds confusing, let’s look at the charts.
Dow Jones Weekly Chart:

A “Measured Move” can also be classified as an “ABC” Swing, (A occurred in January, 2008; B occurred in March; and C has just occurred, completing the pattern), or it could also be known as an “A to B equals C to D” style relationship.
Under the “A to B; C to D” relationship, A would be drawn at the start of the blue line (October high) and then B would be the end of the first blue line (Jan 2008); C would be the start of the second blue line and D would be the projected (now completed) “measured move” of the relationship.
Whatever you call it (I like to call it the “Lightning Bolt” Pattern), the index just provided a very clear pattern of the relationship, and we can use it for further study should the pattern repeat in the future, or on a different stock or time frame.
I do enjoy trading and projecting Measured Move patterns, as they provide clear targets and risk-management points once you recognize odds favor pattern completion, or once you begin to recognize the potential pattern in development.
Market Technicians can get very deep into this particular relationship, utilizing specific algorithms to determine exact and projected relationships between the legs of the moves, using Fibonacci and (sometimes) Elliott Wave parameters to overlay the price and provide exact targeting.  For the ‘at home’ trader, it’s important to understand the basic structure and how you should position yourself or manage your trades when a ‘measured move’ pattern forms.
It goes without saying that you can’t recognize or act on this pattern until the final leg sets up: what we’re looking for is a trading idea that sets up with the “C” leg, or the resumption of trend (or, more specifically, the “C to D” relationship).
Without getting much deeper in explaining this pattern, use this example as a classic textbook case of the pattern and try to work in your own ideas about trading structure and price projections should you recognize this pattern in development in the near future - it often occurs more than you would expect.
2 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:11 | 显示全部楼层
Thursday’s Trend Day in the Dow and Ford
July 24th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s action gave us yet another “Trend Day,” but it wasn’t your typical trend day for the broader market.  Let’s look at the charts and see what we can learn from the price action.
DIA 5-min chart:

Why was today’s action atypical of a trend day in the indexes?  We lacked a large (or significant) opening gap this morning.  That’s not much of a big deal, but with a gap, we could have had more indication today’s action would indeed ‘fully trend.’
We did have range contraction in the indexes yesterday, and a slight ’spinning top’ candle formed in the Dow, but that’s often not enough to give full confidence odds favor a trend day - I like to see a doji or price being at some sort of resistance or support, and intraday prices have consolidated.  Trend days can be violent range expansion moves out of equilibrium.
Nevertheless, today’s action will be classified a trend day, but when you noticed this and defined it as such (and began applying appropriate techniques) was up to you.
One thing that was remarkable about today’s action was that of the “Slow Creep” nature of prices.  There really weren’t many “swing oscillations” in price, and price slowly ebbed (or drained) its way lower, preventing clean entries and retracement swings.  As a ’swing’ intraday trader, I need these to confirm entries - however, the moment I feel odds have shifted enough to classify the day as a trend day, I generally will establish a core position (small) and hold it into the close.  If it is to be a true trend day, initial trade location will not be important, as we expect price to close on the lows of the day.
The blue circled area was your highest probability ’scalp’ trade of the day, and could have been the position to enter the core trade, but I still would not have expected a trend to unfold at that point.  The moving averages held as resistance, and the averages formed the “most bearish orientation possible,” lending credence to the developing ‘trend day’ hypothesis.
From that point on, sellers quietly, behind the scenes, dominated the buyers until there was a retracement up (two bars) and then a sustained sell-off into the close.  It’s these ‘creeping trends’ that plague both sides of the market:  Sellers cannot find ideal trade location (retracements) to unload (or get short), and buyers keep thinking “well, this must be the bottom.”  Despite the cleanliness of the chart above, the day’s action was difficult to trade because we always like to enter ‘fade’ trades or clean retracements.
Ford Motor Company (F) reported its largest quarterly loss ever:  more than $8 billion.  As expected, the stock was punished by investors in what is deemed a ‘classic’ trend day structure.  Let’s learn from it.
Ford Motor Company (F):

That’s more like it!  The day began with a large (relative) opening gap (greater than 2%) and then provided a counterswing entry, and then flatlined until selling momentum increased after 1:00.  Although price did not close on the lows of the day, it wasn’t far above them.  Volume, not surprisingly, was high today.
Study today’s price action in the indexes and in your favorite stocks for lessons on trend days and appropriate risk management and trading tactics.
No Comments | add comment


Gold Takes Unexpected Swing
July 24th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Gold prices corrected sharply this week, breaking an upward swing and ‘breakout trade’ pathway, falling just shy of its estimated $1,000 target from the recent triangle breakout pattern.
Gold prices (per ounce) daily:

There are certainly a couple of ways to draw this triangle (is it ascending?  does the trendline start at the March $1,000 high? etc), but the fact is that price did violate the upper boundary and was surging on its way to a fulfilled ‘break-out trade’ mode.  Recent stock market strength among other factors contributed to this recent - somewhat unexpectedly ‘violent’ - downswing.
Gold prices did form a ‘flat divergence’ with the most recent upswing, meaning that this development was not absolutely a surprise.  Flat divergences occur when price makes a clearer higher swing high, yet the momentum oscillator makes an almost identical swing peak (fails to confirm the higher high).  These divergence patterns are not as strong as true negative divergences, but they are warning flags indeed.
The semi-shooting star pattern (candle) at the peak didn’t add to the bullish camp’s argument.
This is a lesson that we need to constantly follow price action for continued signs of strength or of emerging signs of weakness, and not let our overarching bias, trade position, or analysis blind us to up-to-the-minute observations and occurrences in price behaviors.
Right now, the structure seems to favor support about the $910 to $920 area - $910 corresponds with the prior break-out zone (which has already been tested, but subsequent tests may be more likely to fail) and $920 corresponds with the 50 day EMA ($923.43 to be exact).  A break beneath $910 per ounce would set-up a ‘magnet trade’ to the $880 - $890 per share level.
Price faces a critical juncture in the next few days which we need to watch very closely.
3 Comments | add comment



A Useful Inflation Calculator
July 23rd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The MoneyChimp website offers a simple inflation calculator and brief description of the Federal Reserve’s role in combating inflation - the site is worth a look as well.
Inflation is the hidden burden that decreases buying power over time; as such, it’s important to know what the current rate of inflation is and how it will affect your long-term portfolio and investments.
Through MoneyChimp’s “Inflation Calculator,” you can Input your Current Principle (money now), Years to grow the investment, Growth rate (don’t get carried away here… 7% - 10% on average is more than reasonable), and finally the inflation rate (which is close to 3% per year) - with all these inputs, the calculator will tell you the Future Value of your investment, as well as what the Buying Power is in today’s dollars.
In addition to playing out different scenarios with your finances, you can view a slider tab of historical annual inflation rates.
For example, from 1970 - 1980, the annual rate of inflation was 8%.
From 2000 - 2008, the annual rate was 2.7%.
For 2007, the rate was 4.1%.  I am almost certain the rate of inflation for 2008 will be close to, if not greater than that number.
Finally, the page gives you a little background detail on exactly what inflation is and how the Federal Reserve measures it and tries to combat it.
Hint:  It has to do with Housing, Apparel, Medical Care and other expenses, and separates Food and Energy into a separate category for study.
See what interesting results you can find as you deepen your knowlede of long-term investing.
No Comments | add comment



Hear Russell Sands Discuss Turtle Trading
July 23rd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Are great traders born, or can they learn the skills?  Is it Nature (in-born) or Nurture (learned)?  INO TV has released a video of Russell Sands, an original famed “Turtle Trader” discuss his experience as a turtle and his thoughts on the matter.
Entitled “I am a Turtle,” Sands discusses what he learned and provides his perspective on the long-standing debate.
In the early 80s, two men were in a debate about how great traders are made. Is it nature or nurture? Are great traders born with a natural intuition for economics, human psychology and self-discipline, or are great traders a product of intense education and practice? Out of this question emerged an experimental trading group called the “Turtles“. These individuals, with little to no trading experience (hand-selected from a newspaper advertisement) were put through a vigorous training in trend following by famed traders Richard Dennis and Bill Eckhardt.
Out of this experimental group, Russell Sands was one of the first trainees. In this INO TV presentation, “I Am A Turtle,” Sands shares the lessons and methodologies that his professional trainers taught him.
The video is free, as are other videos from INO.com TV, but it does require quick registration.  I am a huge proponent and member of the INO.com Educational Video Service, and I strongly recommend you become a member as well - it’s only $99 for a full year of access ($49 for a quarter) to over 500 video presentations by dozens upon dozens of wonderful trading instructors across a wide variety of topics - well worth the small fee.  All videos are on-demand at your convenience.
Stay tuned to INO TV for their next set of complimentary seminars. I’ll keep you posted.
(PS - I am doing my blogging this week from sunny Orlando, Florida just outside the Disney Theme Park studios - it’s a working vacation!)
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:33 | 显示全部楼层
AAPL Amazing Intraday Gap and Recovery
July 22nd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

There’s so much to be said about Apple’s (AAPL) intraday performance today.  From the 10% gap down to a rally to close the day off just over 2%, Apple traders were in for an amazing ride.  Let’s look at the intraday and daily chart to see where this leaves us.
AAPL 5-min:

The bulls truly turned a bad situation around in a hurry.  I watched Apple fall after earnings were released yesterday and I figured we’d have a bad gap opening and I suspected there would be at least a 50% retracement of that gap.  I didn’t expect an almost full gap recovery situation!  I tip my hat to the bulls for finding deep value in the price plunge.
Apple reported record June earnings and Q2 profit over 30% greater than Q1, yet most of this was already priced into the stock, and traders punished Apple for lowered guidance in earnings ahead.  These kinds of situations are enough to make your head spin and give you extreme frustration as a newer trader.
“But they had record profits!  Why did their stock go down so much?!?”
To make your head spin even further, Wachovia Bank (WB) reported over $8 billion in losses in Q2, that it will be slashing its dividend, and that it will be laying off over 10,000 workers and it would be almost lunacy to think their stock ended the day well.  But it did.  Wachovia ended the day 27% higher - but these points are for another discussion.
With Apple, usually the best strategy to employ after a gap is to attempt at least initally to trade against the gap, playing for a partial or full fill.  I don’t like to fade equity gaps greater than 2%, but you just never know what will happen so it’s often best to employ a consistent strategy, even if you do so with a smaller than normal position.
Anyway, as the day developed, price initially found resistance via the 20 period EMA which was then broken (and turned into support) before finding resistance at the 50 period EMA, and once it was broken to the upside as well, the ’skies cleared’ and opportunities opened up vastly to the upside with renewed confidence.  I listed the “Highest Probability” trade as being the retest of the confluence of support coming from the 20 and 50 period EMA converging - it was a low risk, high reward situation that paid dividends for aggressive traders.
So where does this leave us on the daily chart?
AAPL Daily:

The downtrend is still officially confirmed, and price is ‘officially’ beneath all three key moving averages, including the 200 period (known as the “line in the sand”) but I’m sure Apple bulls take solace in today’s action.
67 million shares transacted today - while not a record, the activity was definitely impressive.
Let’s continue to watch this stock and how its movements may affect the broader stock market.
2 Comments | add comment


Generate Your Own Equity Curve (Simulator)
July 22nd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

TechnicalTrades.net offers traders an Equity Curve Generator algorithm/program for you to input parameters into the formula and randomly simulate outcomes that could be representative of your trading system.
Generally, the success or failure of a trader is due to study of the overall system they have developed personally, and diligent application of that system in the larger picture; individual trades really do not matter, especially when they become one point among hundreds of ’spots’ on an Excel Spreadsheet or some other graphical program that demonstrates equity curves or probability distributions.
There is a Catch-22 regarding evaluating your trading system: You must know a close estimate of your win/loss ratio as well as your % win (or probability of a winning trade) to evaluate your results over a long enough time frame, depending on how frequently you trade. In other words, you won’t truly know how your system performs until you gather sufficient data - trades - to generate a proper %win ratio and win/loss ratio.
One major solution to this dilemma is to run various parameters you think may be closest to your chosen system through an Equity Curve Generator algorithm. The above link provides such a simulation.
The page gives you instructions, but you need to know ( or “toy with”) the following:
1. Ave Win divided by Ave Loss (Win/Loss Ratio).
2. Win percentage

The Win/Loss ratio is derived from an average of each trade. Remember that to enter a ‘good’ trade, you should strive to make your profit target a key value larger than your downside (or protective) stop. You can set this ratio to be exactly 2:1, where your profit target will be exactly two times your stop.
In other words, if a stock trades at $50 and you believe you can get an upside target of $55, then you would place your stop at $47.50 ($2.50 less than the current entry). This is a bit mechanical, and doesn’t really test out in the real world, but it gives you an idea of how to achieve relative consistency with the win/loss ratio.
Keep in mind that most traders will tell you to strive for a 3 to 1 profit to loss goal on every trade, but sometimes this is impractical. Sometimes you may find a 1 to 1 profit to loss parameter to be acceptable, but you will need to consider the second variable - % correct - in order to evaluate this.
The Win Percentage (or “Win Rate”) tells you - on average - how many times you hit your profit target vs. your downside stop. In other words, how many times on average do you take some profit vs taking a loss due to a stop?
Don’t get over-eager - be realistic. Unless you are a position trader or investor, you’re not likely to get many 10 to 1 risk/reward ratio readings, or you might not even get many 5 to 1 (especially if you are a scalper or day-trader).
Also, be realistic in that ‘pure chance’ is a .5 % win (this translates to a 50% chance that a trade will succeed). I do not recommend you get into the simulator and type in anything above 75% unless you want to amuse yourself and see what the numbers would be like. There is too much volatility or things that you cannot predict in the market in a given position, and it is extremely difficult to sustain a high winning percentage for a long time. Realize that most professional active traders achieve in the neighborhood of 40% to 60% win ratios - let this be a sobering thought.
Visit the site and play around with these two variables (ratios).
The bottom line that you should learn from this exercise: You do not have to be perfect to make a lot of money in the markets. The key is consistently letting your average wins be larger than your average losses, among other considerations.
Have fun with this exercise!
No Comments | add comment



Gaming the Market
July 21st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The author of the blog “Gaming the Market” informed me that his blog has moved and I wanted to provide the link to his excellent and developing blog.
“Gaming the Market” provides excellent analysis and detailed posting on information relating to the popular topic of “gaming the market.”  So far, the author has addressed short-selling, the plunge protection team (does it exist?!), insider trading, convertible arbitrage, options & stock movement, and more.
I was particularly interested in his recent post regarding the famous “Plunge Protection Team” (entitled “Front-Running a Systemic Crash“) where he discusses a variety of opinions and analysts’ statements regarding this mysterious force that may or may not exist.
Here’s a couple of teaser quotes:
“Ever notice how official speeches to prop up the US capital markets are timed right before a massive sell off? How about those last hour rallies when the market looks really bad?”
The blog then provides the full-text of Executive Order 12631: Working Group on Financial Markets and then discusses the “Treasury’s War Room.”
In other posts, he describes the mechanics of short-selling, why ’short-interest’ is not necessarily comprised entirely of ’short-sellers,’ and later discusses the “Short-Squeeze of the Century” (hint: It was in the 1800s and was comprised of activity on a given railroad stock - interesting historical read).
Be sure and stop by and check out some of his material.  I’m looking forward to learning more.
1 Comment | add comment



Larger Divergences Form - Selling Ahead?
July 21st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s reversal in the indexes give us pause about the short-term continued bullish direction.  Let’s look at the multiple momentum divergences that have formed on the higher intrday time-frames.
DIA 30 minute chart:

On the 30 minute chart, we see the classic “Three Push” or “Three Swing” pattern, all three of which have formed negative momentum divergences.  Under the principle “momentum precedes price,” we can potentially anticipate a correction or ’sell-swing’ in prices in the short-term.
Negative momentum divergences often highlight the ‘loss of momentum’ on the side of the bulls/buyers, as higher buying pressure is slowly diminishing and ‘momentum’ or price acceleration declines.  An object in motion often slows before it stops and reverses, and prices in the market place often follow this pattern.
In addition to the momentum divergence, volume has been diverging as well.  Higher prices are not being confirmed by higher volume, and higher prices on lower volume is often seen as a sign of bearishness as well.
On the 15-minute chart, the divergences are a little clearer - though there are four divergences that have formed.
DIA 15 minute chart:

I would classify this as a “lengthy” momentum divergence, one of which is being made on lower volume (which is evident on the chart).
Recall that the recent rally has occurred under the backdrop of a confirmed bear market where the higher time frames are in confirmed down trends.  Any such rallies are classified as ‘counter-trend rallies’ and can often occur and end quickly with little warning in both directions.
Be safe out there, and don’t overstay your welcome in the postions you are trading.
4 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:34 | 显示全部楼层
AAPL Amazing Intraday Gap and Recovery
July 22nd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

There’s so much to be said about Apple’s (AAPL) intraday performance today.  From the 10% gap down to a rally to close the day off just over 2%, Apple traders were in for an amazing ride.  Let’s look at the intraday and daily chart to see where this leaves us.
AAPL 5-min:

The bulls truly turned a bad situation around in a hurry.  I watched Apple fall after earnings were released yesterday and I figured we’d have a bad gap opening and I suspected there would be at least a 50% retracement of that gap.  I didn’t expect an almost full gap recovery situation!  I tip my hat to the bulls for finding deep value in the price plunge.
Apple reported record June earnings and Q2 profit over 30% greater than Q1, yet most of this was already priced into the stock, and traders punished Apple for lowered guidance in earnings ahead.  These kinds of situations are enough to make your head spin and give you extreme frustration as a newer trader.
“But they had record profits!  Why did their stock go down so much?!?”
To make your head spin even further, Wachovia Bank (WB) reported over $8 billion in losses in Q2, that it will be slashing its dividend, and that it will be laying off over 10,000 workers and it would be almost lunacy to think their stock ended the day well.  But it did.  Wachovia ended the day 27% higher - but these points are for another discussion.
With Apple, usually the best strategy to employ after a gap is to attempt at least initally to trade against the gap, playing for a partial or full fill.  I don’t like to fade equity gaps greater than 2%, but you just never know what will happen so it’s often best to employ a consistent strategy, even if you do so with a smaller than normal position.
Anyway, as the day developed, price initially found resistance via the 20 period EMA which was then broken (and turned into support) before finding resistance at the 50 period EMA, and once it was broken to the upside as well, the ’skies cleared’ and opportunities opened up vastly to the upside with renewed confidence.  I listed the “Highest Probability” trade as being the retest of the confluence of support coming from the 20 and 50 period EMA converging - it was a low risk, high reward situation that paid dividends for aggressive traders.
So where does this leave us on the daily chart?
AAPL Daily:

The downtrend is still officially confirmed, and price is ‘officially’ beneath all three key moving averages, including the 200 period (known as the “line in the sand”) but I’m sure Apple bulls take solace in today’s action.
67 million shares transacted today - while not a record, the activity was definitely impressive.
Let’s continue to watch this stock and how its movements may affect the broader stock market.
2 Comments | add comment












Larger Divergences Form - Selling Ahead?
July 21st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s reversal in the indexes give us pause about the short-term continued bullish direction.  Let’s look at the multiple momentum divergences that have formed on the higher intrday time-frames.
DIA 30 minute chart:

On the 30 minute chart, we see the classic “Three Push” or “Three Swing” pattern, all three of which have formed negative momentum divergences.  Under the principle “momentum precedes price,” we can potentially anticipate a correction or ’sell-swing’ in prices in the short-term.
Negative momentum divergences often highlight the ‘loss of momentum’ on the side of the bulls/buyers, as higher buying pressure is slowly diminishing and ‘momentum’ or price acceleration declines.  An object in motion often slows before it stops and reverses, and prices in the market place often follow this pattern.
In addition to the momentum divergence, volume has been diverging as well.  Higher prices are not being confirmed by higher volume, and higher prices on lower volume is often seen as a sign of bearishness as well.
On the 15-minute chart, the divergences are a little clearer - though there are four divergences that have formed.
DIA 15 minute chart:

I would classify this as a “lengthy” momentum divergence, one of which is being made on lower volume (which is evident on the chart).
Recall that the recent rally has occurred under the backdrop of a confirmed bear market where the higher time frames are in confirmed down trends.  Any such rallies are classified as ‘counter-trend rallies’ and can often occur and end quickly with little warning in both directions.
Be safe out there, and don’t overstay your welcome in the postions you are trading.
4 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:35 | 显示全部楼层
How GOOG Ended the Week and the Fall-out
July 19th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Google Inc (GOOG) missed earnings this week and plunged almost 10% by week’s end.  Let’s look at the daily and weekly chart briefly to see if we can find any clues for potential price action in the future.
Google Daily:

With the failed earnings expectations, Google stock - proving once again why it is known as an extraordinarily volatile stock - fell $52.00 per share (almost 10%).   While the earnings expectations were a surprise, the current downtrend is not.
This is a classic example of how ’surprises’ often occur in the direction of the prevailing trend, which is clearly down now on the daily chart (price formed a recent series of lower lows and lower highs before breaking the downward sloping trend channel).
The moving averages have now formed ‘the most bearish orientation possible’ and volume has accelerated to the downside.  The momentum oscillator has not yet registered a new low for the recent move, but will likely catch up soon before long.
Right now, barring a ‘relief’ or counter-rally, the path of least resistance appears to the downside, with an initial target being $450 which would fill the prior earnings gap.
Price now sits beneath the 61.2% Fibonacci retracement from the March bottom to the May peak.  This key retracement is located at $485 per share.
Google Weekly:

The weekly chart shows a strong run-up into ‘euphoria’ that turned way into distribution and then distressed selling into the beginning of 2008, with a potential ‘dead cat bounce’ or counter-rally in mid-2008 which takes us to our current sell-swing and violation of the key support zones from the weekly chart.
As seen from this chart, the path of least resistance also appears to be to the downside, barring some unforseen anouncement or buying strength not evidenced in the charts.
Will Apple (AAPL), a stock that has traded in a similar pattern to Google, follow suit?  AAPL is at key support zones and the violation of those zones could lead to a similar and potentially sudden move down.
Let’s continue to watch both of these stocks closely throughout the next few weeks.
No Comments | add comment


Confirmed Bear Market Rally Underway
July 18th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

This week finally gave traders the ‘bounce’ they were anticipating, in terms of an overdue “oversold” technical rally.  Let’s look at this development and try to make some price projections on what might happen next.
First, the Dow Jones Daily Chart:

I think initially, my first thoughts are that short-sellers are covering en masse which helped ignite this deeply oversold technical rally.  Second, buyers have found immense value at these levels, and bottom fishers are emerging.
This has led to a ‘uniformity of thought’ and direction, resulting in three trend-style days in a row where buyers dominated sellers mercilessly.  Call this the “Revenge of the Bulls” if you will.  Notice the classic momentum divergence that preceded this rally underway.
That being said, the reason I call this a confirmed bear rally is because of the ‘violence’ of the buying.  Also, the broader trend is down, and price has now breached the falling 20 day moving average, confirming the rally.  The first major zone of overhead resistance comes in at 11,800, which is the same area as the January/March lows and also is the zone of the 50 period EMA.
For Fibonacci lovers (I myself am one), it’s important to pay attention to the following key retracement areas, drawn from the intraday high to low of the May to July move:
38.2% Retracement:  11,708
50% Retracement:  11,982
61.8% Retracement:  12,256

The impetus shifts to the bulls for their turn at driving the market for the short term - risk is now to the downside (short-side) until proven otherwise.
Let’s look at the S&P 500 Weekly Chart for more clues:

Another positive divergence on the higher time frame preceded this rally.  I was expecting this rally as early as last week and was able to play it aggressively when it materialized (but not before taking a few stops).
Now it is difficult to miss the rally, especially given the temporary bullish conditions of the indexes at present.
A large swing positive divergence has set-up, volume has hit capitulatory levels (buyers capitulated short-term, exhausting themselves), and a very clear bullish ‘hammer’ has formed on the weekly chart.
I am targeting initially 1,325 on the S&P as a minimal price objective, which corresponds with the moving average convergence, prior congestion (from earlier this year), and the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the March to July move (exactly at 1,320).
For reference:
38.2% Retracement:1,292
50% Retracement: 1,320
61.8% Retracement:  1,348

Let’s continue watching and trading these developments, but let’s also realize that this is a counter-trend move, and as such we should be vigilantly watching for any sign of a resumption of the primary trend to the downside.  Trading long here is roughly equivalent to picking up dollars in front of a possible steam-roller.  Yes, you can make money, but you should do so carefully and not overstay your welcome here.  Odds are that the primary down trend will reassert itself before long - there just may be 3 weeks to a month or more of ‘bullishness’ before that happens.
Trade carefully and well.
9 Comments | add comment



Will Your Starbucks be Closing? See Full List Here.
July 18th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

If you’ve become dependent on that morning cup o’ Joe from your favorite local Starbucks, you might want to check out this list published by USA Today which lists every single Starbucks (SBUX) store (600 of them) that will be closing soon.
USA Today Article Link to PDF File of all 600 Starbucks Store Closings

If you just want to know how many Starbucks will be closing in each state, view a compact list provided by Bill Virgin writing for Seattlepi.com.
Not surprisingly, the following large states were hit the hardest:
California (88 closings)
Florida (59 closings)
Texas (57 closings)
I will be losing a Starbucks just down the road from me in my hometown, but no worries because I think there are at least 5 others in the city.
Investors in the stock have seen an abysmal performance over the last few years:

Management believes the closings will help save capital and potentially increase profits long-term.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:36 | 显示全部楼层
SKF - UltraShort Financials: A Lesson in Defense and Stops
July 17th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

I sincerely hope you weren’t majorly short the Financial sector the last few days - if so, I hope your stops took you out before carnal and potentially devastating damage was done to your account.  Let’s look at what went wrong (and right) so quickly.
Let’s assume you heard the news of how Financial stocks were collapsing, Indy Mac was taken over, the US Banking system was on the verge of collapse or any other manner of bearish news.  Let’s assume you’d heard that you can ’short’ the financial sector (make money while they go down) in an ‘inverse’ fund (meaning, you ‘buy’ the fund to get short).  Let’s assume that you were told you can make a lot more money with an inverse leverage fund, such as the SKF.  Let’s assume you got short early this week.  May we also assume you didn’t know much about ETF funds and this was one of your first experiences with them?
SKF: UltraShort Financials ProShares:

So early in the week, your position was way up.  Something ‘bad’ happened on Wednesday.  Shares you had purchased in the $200 per share area suddenly plunged to $160 - weren’t the financial stocks supposed to plunge?  How could they possibly be rallying (and your position falling) if there’s so much bad news out there?  For heaven’s sake Jim Cramer - Mr. Bullish man - even told you to “sell everything, especially Financials” last week.
How could something so ’sure-fire’ go so wrong so quickly?
From a high of $210 a share on Tuesday to a gap-down today and low of $136 on Thursday, the UltraShort (two times the leverage of the XLF) Financials ETF has absolutely killed the many people and funds that aggressively accumulated it, thinking it was a safe bet with all the rampant horrific financial news out there.
We generally learn that when extremes permeate the marketplace, short-term capitulation or euphoria takes over, and literally everyone who wants to buy has already bought (or sell) and there then exists a vacuum to the opposing direction, which is then exacerbated by profit takers and stop-loss levels being triggered.
If you failed to put in a stop-loss - even a ‘damage control’ stop beneath the rising 20 period moving average - you were in for a massive and tremendously unexpected surprise.  Even if you weren’t involved in this calamity, there are many lessons to learn.
1.  Never buy something that’s grossly overextended beyond its 10 or 20 period moving average
2.  Never buy (or sell) something when it seems it is a ’sure-fire bet’ that can’t go wrong - often, trader confidence is negatively correlated with ensuing price action (if we’re “sure” prices will go up, then they’ll often go down - hard).
3.  Always trade with a stop loss, even if it is considered by you to be a ‘disaster’ loss.
4.  Try not to follow the crowd in our out of a stock or sector
5.  If you’ve learned these lessons, it may be safe to trade against (fade) such uniformity of thought
Also, only use leverage if you know what you’re doing, how the leverage affects you on the upside and downside, and know the worst case scenario provided it occurs - you may need to place tighter stops with a leveraged position.  Also, it’s best to use leverage only with proven experience and time in the market.
Also, don’t give up - the lessons we learn today, even if painful, will only make us better traders, if only we learn what NOT to do.
3 Comments | add comment


Notable Links for Thursday
July 17th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Let’s read a few highlights from around the blog world from short-selling to oil & gold and beyond!
Adam Warner, a former options market maker on the floor, provides a very insightful and thoughtful discussion on the recent short-sell rule changes in his post Short Scream.
Adam writes, “The consequences? Like Mr. Practical says, reduced liquidity as a starter. And how about increased put premiums? Shorting stock gives MM’s ammo to short puts as well, especially when they already own calls against the short stock.
Higher puts of course translate to higher volatility. Which on the margins will creep into the volatility of the stock itself. And that will be the ultimate outcome.”
Rob Hanna of Quantifiable Edges has some insightful research in his post Will The Bounce Continue? which details what happens when the NASDAQ hits a 50 day low and then bounces 3% the next day.  It’s happened 28 times - did he find an edge?
Furthermore, Rob tests What Happens After Gaps Up Fail, which is a subject very near to me in studying gap trading analysis.  He has some excellent research - also check out his subscription based “Quantifiable Edges” Subscriber letter which is released each Sunday evening and contains various in-depth analysis from his current research (that so far I haven’t been able to find anywhere else).
Adam Hewison of Market Club recently released two short educational videos on gold and crude oil worth a quick look.  Hewison discusses key chart points on gold in his video “Has Gold Topped Out?” and then discusses key levels and long term charts in his inquisitive video “Is the Move for Crude Oil Over?
Hewison writes, “I have prepared a short video on crude oil to show you why we feel it is on the defensive and why we should see some lower to sideways action in the near-term
In the video I will show you precise points where I think crude oil will find natural support before resuming its upward trend.”
Barry Ritholtz provides a must-read commentary entitled The Psychology of Selling which details why we commit psychological errors in pricing and refuse to accept the inevitable.

No Comments | add comment



Trading Wednesday’s Trend Day
July 16th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

How might we have identified and taken advantage of today’s developing trend structure?  Let’s take a couple of perspectives.
First, we, along with many other traders, have been expecting some sort of ‘oversold technical bounce,’ meaning odds were increasing for some sort of ’snap-back’ rally, similar to the visual concept of a rubber band being stretched.  Such a rally is never guaranteed, but was expected - it was this structure that we were watching the daily charts, waiting for a possible ‘index burst’ to occur.
Trend days occur when continuity of thought on both sides of the market dominate the day’s trading.  For example, assume that in this case, short-sellers may have had significant profits on their positions and would be eager to take those profits at the eariest sign of market strength.  Buyers, seeing rampant weakness in the indexes, may have been waiting for the first sign of strength to ’snatch up’ deeply discounted value stocks, and were waiting for a signal to engage in potential ‘bottom fishing’ tactics.
Today, both realities commenced with the short-sellers covering (adding buying pressure) and the buyers… well, buying.  Trend days result when one side of the market dominates the other.
Let’s look at some of the opportunities in the Dow Jones ETF - the Diamonds (DIA):

The day began with an overnight gap (up) that was almost instantly filled (remember the first play of the day when there’s a gap is to ‘fade’ the gap and target yesterday’s close).  With this complete, the next trade is often to play back in the same direction of the gap and play at least for the intraday high (which was achieved very quickly).
Price found resistance at the 200 period MA, and a flag-style retracement occurred which set-up a potential ‘bull flag’ trade which met its objective very quickly.  At this point, it was still uncertain if a trend day would develop, but the picture was becoming clearer with each new bar - the measured move took price above its key moving averages, and a key test set-up.
The “Make or Break” test occurred just before noon when price retraced back to the confluence of its key moving averages - if price broke this level, we would return back to the value area established lower, and perhaps retest yesterday’s close to see if sellers were still present.  If price continued its momentum higher, odds are short-sellers would exit their positions and buyers would be inspired with confidence to continue trading long (buying).
As such, a great ‘bracket’ trade was established (playing off the reaction or success/failure of the test, rather than trying to predict what was about to happen - either move would set-up a good trend move or ’swing’).
The bulls won and at this point, a core trade could be established long, with aggressive trades taking place at any retracement to the key 20 period EMA - this was the successful structure and trading tactics of the day… but the picture was not clear until half of the day was over that it was safe to play for a larger, aggressive target.
The price structure of the NASDAQ ETF - the QQQQs - was similar to that of the DIA:

I highlight two bull flags that set-up on the day - yes, they look perfect in hindsight, but the more you see these patterns and the more ingrained they become, the more confidence you will have in recognizing them in real time and then taking appropriate action.
Odds now favor higher short-term prices on the major indexes, and the fact that Financial stocks surged so much today (some of which surged more than 10% in a single day) adds bullish fuel to the fire - it’s difficult now to be a (short term) shorter!
The ensuing rally will be classified as a ‘counter-trend reaction’ against the prevailing down-trend, yet there are still opportunities to capture this up-swing either in the index ETFs or in potential indivual stocks.
5 Comments | add comment



Oil Stocks Fall ahead of Oil Prices
July 16th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

In classic nature, oil stocks led the recent oil price decline, further giving clues that oil prices were in for a correction of some sorts.  Let’s take a look at Exxon-Mobil (XOM) and Chevron Corp (CVX) and the recent price of Crude Oil
Exxon-Mobil (XOM):

XOM peaked at $95 per share (closing price) in early May with a negative momentum divergence before rolling over beneath its key support via its daily moving averages, finding resistance at these averages (forming a coil), and breaking down sharply in this week’s trading.
One would expect with the headlines so bullish on oil that this stock would be surging as well - not so.  In fact, rampant magazine articles often precede the end of speculative moves, not the beginning.  Exxon-Mobile price has declined considerably since their May peak, meaning odds are that lower oil prices may be yet to come.
Chevron Corp (CVX):

Chevron shows a very similar picture, only the $100 price high was met on high momentum.  Price still failed at its key moving averages and have rolled over strongly in July.
Next, let’s look at Crude Oil prices themselves and see how these stock prices may have given us clues about the underlying futures prices.
Crude Oil Prices:

This chart does not yet show today’s intraday or closing action, but price will touch the blue 50 period EMA when the chart is updated with the daily close.
There was a negative momentum divergence (not shown) headed into the new price highs, which could serve as an intermediate top should further pressure continue on crude oil prices.
Needless to say, lower crude oil prices will be a boon for stocks, which is what we’re seeing in today’s almost 2% gain in the US Stock Market indexes.
Let’s keep our eyes focused here to see what further clues we can learn from oil and the economy.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 19:38 | 显示全部楼层
Apple’s AAPL Latest Actions
July 16th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

What has Apple Inc (AAPL) been up to in terms of price action lately?  Are we coming up on a fresh buy signal?
Let’s look closer.
Apple Weekly:

Price has formed a lower swing high, but has pulled back and held up (especially given a drastic June and July in the broader indexes) in terms of relative strength to the market.  Price has been unable to close beneath its rising 20 month EMA, which is now situated just shy of $168 per share.
Should this support hold, and should price continue its potential new swing higher, this could be a good, low-risk buying opportunity for the stock.  Notice the volume has been declining virtually throughout all of 2008 - that’s not an excellent sign, however.
Apple Daily:

Price formed a ‘double top’ complete with large negative momentum divergence early in June, and price began a down-swing which found support at the rising 200 day moving average (setting up a good short-term buy opportunity).
The resultant buy swing did not last long, however, price was able to form a positive divergence and break a falling trendline (blue), upon which now price is supporting and forming an intraday doji candle.
Support comes in just shy of $160 per share - notice how price has rejected this level three times prior since June.  Should it hold again, it would set up a nice trade.  Even if the support line is broken, the risk-reward relationship is decent, given that you can place your stop close to entry - possibly around $163 or $161 and then play for a target near $190.  Such trades individually do not always work out, but over time, the edge of higher wins to lower losses does tend to play out in your favor.
The Market Club does a good job of following Apple through videos and blog posts for members, and a membership gets you access to deeper analytics and technical scans, as well as proprietary buy/sell signals based on the confluence of different indicator inputs.  Check it out and sign up for membership if you feel it helpful.
Let’s continue to watch Apple stock to see what other opportunities may be in store.
No Comments | add comment


S&P Financial Sector Monthly Charts
July 15th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

With the talk of the Financial Crisis getting more attention in the media, let’s look at the long-term chart of the S&P Financial Sector and the XLF (AMEX Sector SPDR).
S&P Financial Monthly Index:

XLF ETF:

What we’re seeing is a massive collapse in share prices and trend.  Price has now made new monthly lows (remember the month is half-complete) not seen since the late 1990’s, and price has fallen precipitously in value across a wide range of financial stocks.  There are very few pockets of safety in this sector/industry.
Generally, we expect the market to discount the future, and assimilate all known news into the prices of stocks - if so, what’s yet to come in terms of news announcements with share price plunges so dramatic?  Will more banks collapse?  Is this just the beginning (Indy Mac, Freddie Mac, etc)?
I’ll let the charts above speak for themselves rather than taint them with massive annotations.
Notice the volume surge on the XLF exchange traded fund.  Although I don’t display the volume numbers on my charts, monthly volume comes in currently around 2 billion shares - institutions are even at work clearing their accounts of these stocks.
Dr. Steenbarger recently posted a great analysis of regional banks in the following posts:
Banking on Bailouts: How Many IndyMacs are Out There?
The Geographic Distribution of Troubled Banks
A Regional Bank Collapse: No Moral Hazard Here
Many investors are becoming tempted to pick up shares now in these regional banks, some of which have lost 80% of their value since the October highs, and some of which trade less than $10.
While indeed some of these may be trading at excellent values and may return to much higher stock price levels later (say, 5 to 10 years down the road), there’s a good chance some of these banks may go the way of Bear Stearns, Indy Mac, Freddie Mac, etc which have virtually collapsed.
While there may not be better ‘values’ elsewhere in the market, there still is likely a good bit of risk and announcements yet to come regarding banks in this sector.  Do be careful and do your due diligence in fundamental research on stocks you may be tempted to buy - do not do so simply because you feel the price is “cheap.”
Whether you’re holding, buying, or selling, do be careful - and do keep your wits about you during these uncertain and troubling times in the market.
1 Comment | add comment



Markets Lunge for 50% Monthly Fib Retracement
July 15th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

If you’ve been caught in the day-to-day activities of your trading, take a moment now and look at the larger picture of the primary (or broader) trend of the major US Stock Market Indexes - the S&P 500 chart looks eerily similar to the beginning of the 2000-2001 decline.  Let’s look quickly at the Fibonacci retracements of the 2003 - 2007 bull market.
The S&P 500 monthly chart:

Price tested the 38% retracement (1,266) two times in 2008, both at the climactic lows so far in January and March, which have now clearly and convincingly been broken.
The market is now poised to test its 50% retracement of the bull move, which occurs near 1,171.  This is a startling and - for some - unexpected development given the rapidness of the current index plunge.
Look back in time to the S&P Index through 2000 and you see an eerily similar pattern - price formed a semi-double top, broke the rising 20 period moving average, fell through and tested (and found support) at the rising 50 period average, retested the falling 20 period average, and then rolled over, confirming the inevitable.  Price then found resistance at the 50 period average before making a ‘triple bottom’ and beginning the prior bull market, which has now officially and undeniably ended.
The Dow Jones shows a similar pattern, though it has achieved higher prices than its 2000 peak:

The Dow is currently less than 200 points away from testing its monthly 50% Fibonacci retracement.  Price had a stronger rally in 2006 and 2007 than the S&P, so the current peak is higher than the 11,500 peak in 2000, but still the index has (almost) retraced half of the bull market phase from 2003-2007.
Two quick notes:
The structure has clearly taken a turn for the worse, and we are in a confirmed bear market.
Second, we could expect the 50% retracement to provide a counter-rally, temporary bounce back up possibly to test the 50 period monthly moving averages or slightly beyond.  Now might not be the appropriate time to become super bearish, but long term, one has an extremely difficult time being bullish.
4 Comments | add comment



Quick Intraday Structure Overview
July 14th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Monday’s trading was surprising both to bulls and bears - opening with a large overnight gap which was quickly faded, and price closed near the lows of the day.  Let’s look at the structure and possible trading opportunities that presented themselves.
DIA 5-min chart:

With price opening with an overnight (over-weekend) gap, odds are favorable that the gap will fade, but less favorable with an opening gap greater than $1.00 (100 Dow points) which was the case today.  Despite this, the market quickly faded the gap with little effort and only one retracement (which set up a quick bear flag - not labeled).
Price then found support (the target of the fade) at yesterday’s close and then bounced again, only to retest yesterday’s close to form a coil, or specifically a ‘descending triangle,’ which was broken solidly to the downside for a quick trend/momentum move down.
Price made new lows on the day with a surge in volume, complete with a new momentum low, stating odds for lower prices were yet to come.  Price retraced back to the falling 20 period moving average, setting up a quick high-probability ’scalp’ style trade which achieved its target.
This new low on the day was met with lower volume and a rising (positive) momentum divergence, which clues us in that lower prices may be more difficult for sellers to obtain.  It never ceases to amaze me how many intraday lows (or highs) are formed on volume and momentum divergences such as today’s action.
Price then formed a bullish hammer candle and “hammered out a bottom” (as they say) and rallied up to re-test yesterday’s close before failing back to form a higher low on the day and then bulls gathered the necessary strength to take the day back to the positive side of the ledger.
As quick as the end-of-day surge (gains) came, they were over just as fast and price closed at the lower range of the day, confirming the bearish bias on the daily chart.  We keep waiting for an ‘oversold bounce’ but buyers don’t seem to be able to step up the pressure (as of yet) needed to push prices higher.
Today’s action had some good opportunities and good educational examples that are worth further study.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 04:58 | 显示全部楼层
Quick Intraday Structure Overview
July 14th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Monday’s trading was surprising both to bulls and bears - opening with a large overnight gap which was quickly faded, and price closed near the lows of the day.  Let’s look at the structure and possible trading opportunities that presented themselves.
DIA 5-min chart:

With price opening with an overnight (over-weekend) gap, odds are favorable that the gap will fade, but less favorable with an opening gap greater than $1.00 (100 Dow points) which was the case today.  Despite this, the market quickly faded the gap with little effort and only one retracement (which set up a quick bear flag - not labeled).
Price then found support (the target of the fade) at yesterday’s close and then bounced again, only to retest yesterday’s close to form a coil, or specifically a ‘descending triangle,’ which was broken solidly to the downside for a quick trend/momentum move down.
Price made new lows on the day with a surge in volume, complete with a new momentum low, stating odds for lower prices were yet to come.  Price retraced back to the falling 20 period moving average, setting up a quick high-probability ’scalp’ style trade which achieved its target.
This new low on the day was met with lower volume and a rising (positive) momentum divergence, which clues us in that lower prices may be more difficult for sellers to obtain.  It never ceases to amaze me how many intraday lows (or highs) are formed on volume and momentum divergences such as today’s action.
Price then formed a bullish hammer candle and “hammered out a bottom” (as they say) and rallied up to re-test yesterday’s close before failing back to form a higher low on the day and then bulls gathered the necessary strength to take the day back to the positive side of the ledger.
As quick as the end-of-day surge (gains) came, they were over just as fast and price closed at the lower range of the day, confirming the bearish bias on the daily chart.  We keep waiting for an ‘oversold bounce’ but buyers don’t seem to be able to step up the pressure (as of yet) needed to push prices higher.
Today’s action had some good opportunities and good educational examples that are worth further study.
No Comments | add comment


How Have Commodities Compared in 2008?
July 14th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

We have all heard the headline reports about energy prices skyrocketing in 2008, but what have the other commodities been doing in terms of percentage returns?  Let’s take a quick look at Agriculture, Metals, Energy, Livestock, and the CRB Index for their standing now that half of the year has passed.
Commodity Percentage returns so far in 2008:

Line Graph showing monthly progression for 2008:

It’s no surprise that energy prices are up over 50% for the year, and that broader commodities are up as well.
If these trends should continue (and that is a big “if”), we could see energy prices up by 100% per year and the other major commodities up around 30% for the year.  I suspect the Federal Reserve will attempt to step in through raising interest rates, as many have speculated, before this scenario becomes a reality.
Nevertheless, commodities experienced a decent surge (some over 30%) in the first three months of 2008 before falling as the Stock Market ‘bottomed’ in March.  Money flowed back into stocks until late May, while the price of energy (mostly driven by crude oil) climbed almost non-stop for the year so far.
Continue to keep your eye on these broader based commodities, and the division between them for clues on what may be happening beneath the surface (yes, there are many other commodities other than crude oil).
1 Comment | add comment



Freddie & Fannie: Double Trouble
July 14th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Adam Hewison of Market Club recently released a brief educational video that details the fall in these stocks and what it might mean for the larger picture in his video released today entitled, “Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae:  Twin Disasters.”
Hewison states in a post accompanying the video:
“Even after Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made a statement ensuring that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would remain as presently constituted to carry out their mission it was not enough to satisfy most investors.
Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hold about $5 trillion worth of mortgage guarantees in this country, roughly about half of the $9.5 trillion mortgage debt. Their survival is paramount.
The trouble with these two companies is the latest depressing factor in the current credit and confidence crisis that the United States is going through at the present time. This type of negative information is depressing for stocks and weighs on the minds of investors. This type of mindset is similar to the
early seventies when we witnessed the last prolonged bear market.
There are no quick fixes to our current set of problems, only trading opportunities.
We live in a capitalist society and these are the cycles that we go through every 30 to 40 years. This is the price we pay for living in a free society.
My new eight minute video shows in detail how easy it is to avoid disaster stocks like Freddie and Fannie. I also show you in very clear terms how to fortress your portfolio to withstand any type of financial tornado that blows through the world economy.”
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae:  Twin Disasters
Enjoy the video,
Adam Hewison
Hewison reminds us that it’s our job to understand what’s happening and attempt to profit from it in a risk-controlled environment.  Recall that stocks fall (sometimes plunge) faster than they rise, meaning those who employ short-selling or put buying strategies can profit relatively quickly from early identification of stock or company break-downs.
Such strategies themselves are not without risk, as news of salvation or other reports could trigger an instant wave of ’short-covering,’ leaving such positions vulnerable.  Be safe on both sides of the market and adhere to your risk-control parameters.
No Comments | add comment



Gold Breaks Out - Target $1000
July 13th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

As mentioned previously, Gold prices broke out of a triangle consolidation pattern and now appear headed to their price projection target of $1,000 per ounce.  Let’s see how this is possible.

First, gold prices have clearly entered a consolidation pattern, no matter how you draw the trendlines.  Price swings are overlapping and truncating at closer prices as the swings narrow. The moving averages became flat and have now turned back to the upside in the ‘most bullish orientation’ possible.
Gold broke above the upper trendline around $900 per ounce, and then confirmed the break with a ‘throwback’ retracement that tested and held the rising 20 period moving average as well as the break-out zone.
The price projection estimate comes from the height of the triangle (roughly $100 per ounce - from $850 to $950) which is then added to the break-out point just above $900 per ounce which gives a price projection target - if the triangle is valid - to just shy of $1,000 per ounce, which would take price back to its all-time closing high, less than $40 away.
Whether or not we meet our target, gold prices appear to be rather bullish in this environment of economic uncertainty, so be sure to keep a watch on this precious metal, which is also known as a safety place for investment in inflation and uncertain times.
3 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 04:59 | 显示全部楼层
Deteriorating Breadth - Warning Sign?
July 12th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Friday’s action was important, in that breadth declined to new lows for the year, which certainly isn’t good news for the bullish camp.  Let’s look at a few charts and different perspectives on what this might mean.
First, the weekly chart of the NYSE New Highs minus New Lows overlaid against the backdrop of the Dow Jones Industrial Average:

The dark black line (scaled on the left axis) represents the NYSE New Highs - New Lows as programmed in StockCharts.com.  The reading slipped below -700 which represented a key low in the indicator as the Dow made yet another new closing low for 2008.
The downtrend in the NYSE High - Low breadth indicator is clear, and will be so until we can form a higher low.
The Monthly chart (same overlay) looks even more ominous (going back to 2000):

I wonder if somehow this chart is in error, or I have done the overlay wrong.  I’m afraid - if this is correct - then the chart speaks for itself.
I wanted to share a few other perspectives on the breadth from other bloggers:
Dr. Steenbarger does an excellent job of analyzing 2008 new highs and lows in the Wilshire 5000 Index in his post “Adapting to Shifts in Market Regimes“.  Steenbarger writes:
What that tells us is that, as prices move lower, longer time-frame participants are not finding value. What makes for a market bottom is the perception by these participants that the selling has been overdone; that bargains are to be had. When markets move lower and cannot attract buyer interest, they can only do one thing: probe yet lower value regions until equilibrium is attained. That’s exactly what we’ve been seeing over the last month.
Despite the name of the post, Dr. Duru also does very detailed analysis of the breadth measure of stocks being above their 40 day moving average in his post “Does the VIX Need to Spike at A Climactic Low?
Dr. Duru writes:
“Over the past 22 years, we have only had 50 trading days with lower T2108 (stocks trading below their 40 day moving average readings) than the current reading of 9.26%. 32 of those days (64%) came in the aftermath of the October, 1987 crash. The rest of these days cover major climactic moments from the past 20 years”
“We have now spent 7 trading days below 20% on T2108. 20% is considered oversold territory and the point at which new shorts typically represent poor risk/reward.”
“The oversold conditions we have today are sitting at historic proportions!”
Barry Ritholtz at “The Big Picture” shows a chart in his post “S&P 500 vs. AAII Bullish Index” (a sentiment indicator).
Things are different in the markets than we might expect or have become conditioned to accept.  Do be careful.
1 Comment | add comment


Intraday Action - Surge and Plunge
July 11th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Friday’s intraday action in the major US Indexes was nothing shy of stellar, given all the potential economic turbulence that set-up during the day.
Let’s look at the DIA - Dow Jones ETF 5-minute chart:

The day opened with news that Freddie Mac (FRE) may be in severe trouble, and then rumors of a financial collapse occurred, and the index lunged around almost helplessly.
However, there was structure that played out in the index - at least for the first half of the day.
The day’s action opened with an overnight gap that rallied back to resistance via the falling 20 period EMA, which set up the day’s first short (provided you missed the sudden gap-fill trade).
Price formed a doji and then orderly rolled over to hit new lows on the day, before experiencing coiling action about the 20 period EMA (which also set up some ’scalp’ trades).
A multi-swing positive momentum divergence formed all day, which sprung (like a coiled spring) into the afternoon session, slamming the short-sellers and invigorating the once helpless bulls - only to slam the bulls as well.  Trading the afternoon session was extremely difficult - it very much resembled a Fed-Day pattern.
Stocks closed lower on the day, but the losses were not as bad as they could have been, and actually the day went positive at one point.  Today’s action will be classified as a ‘gap-fade’ intraday as such.
Volatility has returned, and it is difficult to trade the market long and short, so do monitor your stops and trade smaller positions if you feel you need to.  Try not to get caught up in the ‘heat’ or emotions of the day.
1 Comment | add comment



Small Edges with Consistent Returns
July 11th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Dr. Steenbarger detailed the notion of the “Small Edge” in his recent post “Small Edges, Consistent Returns.
In the post, Dr. Brett runs a variety of scenarios through Henry Carstens’ P&L Forecaster to compare results across having an edge (or lack thereof) of a couple of percent, or having a win/loss ratio of .9, 1.0, and 1.1.
Read through the various scenarios, and the various outcomes through probabilities using these parameters, contained in his post, and then try out your own parameters on Carsten’s P&L Forecaster - it’s an excellent tool for potentially eye-opening insights.
Steenbarger concludes:
What this tells us is that even small edges in the market generate consistent returns if they are consistently acted upon. This is the message of Henry’s Axiom of the Small Edge: you don’t need a huge edge to make good money; you need to act consistently on the edge that you have.
Our little exercise also shows you how fragile these things are. Just a dip in win percentage from 52% to 48% matters quite a bit over time. Changes in market conditions, changes in our psyche: it doesn’t take much of a nudge to make us profitable or unprofitable.
Be sure to visit back for his follow-up post, which will examine risk/return across various scenarios.
No Comments | add comment



The Collapse of Freddie Mac - FRE
July 11th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The “talk of the town” this morning is the massive overnight plunge and devastating losses in 2008 for government chartered mortagage companies Freddie Mac (FRE) and Fannie Mae (FNA).  Also, Federal National Mortgage (FNM) has shown a very similar pattern.
Let’s look at Freddie Mac (FRE) Monthly:

What’s curious about this chart is the absolute destruction to the stock price in 2008, falling 85% over the past six months.  We are seeing price levels not seen since around 1992.
Then view Freddie Mac (FRE) Weekly:

The weekly chart shows that the take-down in price began roughly as the stock market peaked in October, when the ‘credit crisis’ information was becoming public and dissiminated to investors.  Price fell from above $60 per share down to $5 today.
Investors worry if a government intervention is needed for these companies - and if so, what would that mean.  Should these companies collapse, it would certainly send further shocks to an already weak financial sector (and system) and could signal further losses to holders of mortgage-backed securities.
Keep your eye on the news for any word of a ‘bailout’ or immediate recovery plan from the Fed, which could be a boost to the broader market, and it could happen suddenly.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:00 | 显示全部楼层
LMVTX: A Mutual Fund in Peril
July 10th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

We expect mutual funds to perform roughly in line with the respective average - actually, we expect mutual funds to beat their average because we pay management fees to the fund managers.  What happens when a given fund grossly underperforms its benchmark?
The famous Legg Mason Value Trust (ticker:  LMVTX) is such a fund that has grossly underperformed the S&P 500 both throughout 2008 and since the October 2007 market peak.
Let’s look at the chart before looking at the comparisons:
LMVTX Monthly:

The fund has now reached levels not seen since mid-2003 (early stock market recovery).
LMVTX Weekly:

While the S&P ‘peaked’ in mid-October 2007, LMVTX actually peaked in May.  This is consistent with the fact that breadth was weak at the actual market peak, as fewer stocks made new highs.  Nevertheless, one would expect a closer tie to the underlying benchmark.  Since October 2008, Legg Mason Value Trust has been under constant assault as it aggressively acquired shares of many financial companies as they plunged.
LMVTX vs. the S&P 500 Year to Date (percentage terms):

Bill Miller - famous for beating the S&P 15 years in a row (one of the only major fund managers to do so) - manages the fund, and his core philosophy of investment has stood the test of time, but has been slashed mercilessly in the current difficult market environment.
Miller and his team made three critical errors, which seem perfectly clear in hindsight, but at the time, were part of the core philosophy of his famed value approach to investing:
1.  Miller continuously acquired a broad base of Financial stocks as they decreased rapidly in value.
2.  LMVTX was the third largest investor in Bear Stearns on the way down and before the collapse.
3.  Miller continued to believe that oil and oil stocks (energy) was overvalued for quite some time, and had extremely little exposure to oil stocks or virtually any stock related to the commodity ‘boom.’
4.  Miller and Legg Mason are currently still large investors in Freddie Mac (FRE) and Fannie Mae (FNA), which have plunged through 2008.
It was these four critical errors that led to the slaughter of returns for investors.
For deeper analysis and information, read Steven Goldberg (of Kiplinger) article today at the Washington Post entitled “Ten Funds on the Skids.”  Goldberg singles out Mr. Miller’s fund.  He also explains the ‘value’ in value investing and why it does tend to outperform most strategies long-term.
For more on Bill Miller and the Legg Mason Value Trust specifically, Russell Kinnel (also of Kiplinger) wrote a detailed piece in the Washington Post today entitled, “Is Bill Miller Toast?”
Kinnel writes:
“… should it really come as a surprise that Miller, who was once the talk of the investing world because he beat the stock market 15 consecutive calendar years, has hit a rough patch? No. The streak merely masked Miller’s bold approach to stock picking, a strategy that was sure to run out of steam at some point.”
1 Comment | add comment


A Classic Pattern in Gold - Video
July 10th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

According to Adam Hewison of Market Club, Gold prices are showing a “Classic Pattern” that we should take note.
He has prepared a short video from his Traders Educational Whiteboard Series entitled “A Classic Pattern in Gold” which walks you though his analysis and shows some of the capabilities of the Market Club charting software and strategies.
Hewison states:
(Regarding whether the recent action is a longer term pullback/retracement or reversal) “… depends on how the European Banks handle some of the problems they’re going to face in financing.”
Hewison takes us through the longer term, monthly trend down to the daily chart and reveals a most interesting pattern that I missed in my analysis - it’s a pattern that I frequently overlook because I’m not used to ‘thinking in reverse.’
He then describes the pattern and how the price is expected to play out, including possible price projection targets.
Here is an example of the “Weekly Chart, which we use for Trend Analysis” from the video (links to video):

The final chart walks us through the exact pattern, trendline, and price projection and is very interesting and helpful analysis.
For a membership to the growing Market Club service, visit the homepage (link) and browse around the “What You Get” page and testimonials.  I solidly stand behind the service and have benefited from using it both as a confirmation and idea generation tool.
Thank you Adam and staff for making this video available to us.
No Comments | add comment



Intraday Foibles, Flags, and Reversals
July 9th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s intraday action, like yesterday, was quite interesting and relatively difficult to trade successfully intraday.  Let’s look at the Dow Jones structure intraday and how it factors into the potential ’rounded reversal’ pattern on the hourly chart.
DIA 5-minute:

Price began with an upside gap - such gaps can occur after a strong close or strong previous day.  The gap was immediately filled, and price began to rally back to test intraday highs as expected, forming a rising channel in the process.
A persistent negative momentum divergence developed, and price formed a ‘double top’ formation before breaking down.  It’s remarkable how many times momentum divergences form the intraday highs and lows.
Price languished, consolidated, and then rolled over, breaking its 50 period EMA (which served as support) and then the averages crossed, signaling higher odds for continued downside action (a change in intraday trend).
This was confirmed with a ’support bounce’ off the 200 period moving average, which formed nothing more than a classic bear flag into moving average resistance, which offered one of the highest probability trade set-ups of the day.
Price rolled over comfortably and effortlessly, shattering the 200 period MA before making new lows on the day, forming a classic flag (too weak to test the falling 20 period EMA properly) and closed roughly on the lows of the day.
Although the price action - which offered good opportunities - looks horrendously bearish, the structure of the 60-minute chart still shows potential support - until it is potentially broken.
DIA 60-minute (hourlies):

I mentioned in the previous post that a “Rounded Reversal” might be underway, and this view would be invalidated with a close beneath $111.50 (Dow 11,500) which price is threatening with all horrendousness.  Still, this is part of the potential rounding process - testing lower levels to see if sellers or buyers ’step up to the plate’ and find opportunity at these levels.  Also, today’s action may have shooken out some of the disheartened buyers from yesterday.
If we go lower from these levels, virtually any bullishness short-term will be erased, but I still think there’s a good chance of at least a test of lower levels and an technical oversold (countertrend) bounce - but price will be the ultimate arbiter.  Keep a close watch on tomorrow’s intraday action.
No Comments | add comment



Bond Yields Falling - Pullback or Reversal?
July 9th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Treasury Bond/Note Yields rose rapidly for the first part of June and then fell just as rapidly through the second part.  With yields testing weekly support, and failing daily support, are we due for a reversal back to the downside or a simple reassertion of the potentially newly developed uptrend?
Let’s look at the 10 Year Weekly Yield ($TNX):

Solid support comes to the yield in two forms:
The flattening 20 week EMA (at $38.96, or 3.96%)
The horozintal approximate support/resistance line just above $38.00 (or 3.80%).
Also, yields have broken out of the downtrend since mid-2007 (when the Fed began cutting rates) and is now in a confirmed, technical uptrend.  We should expect the $38.50 level to hold if it truly is an uptrend, and to break convincingly lower should we be experiencing a reversal back to the downside.
Remember that yields (in the current environment) do tend to move roughly in line with the direction of the S&P 500, so if the stock market rallies, one would expect yields to rally as well (presumably, one factor being investors are pulling money out of bonds to participate in a potential stock rally, driving bond prices down and yields higher).
The Daily chart shows a little more bearish picture, but remember that sometimes a simple and mild retracement on the higher time frames can look relatively nasty on the lower time frames.
$TNX Daily:

Price has broken key daily support levels, via the 20, 50, and 200 day moving averages, but yields attempted a gap-up today but failed (intraday so far).
Momentum appeared ready to turn up, but is back testing momentum lows formed just a few days ago.
We’ll continue to keep our attnetion focused on the Bond/T-Note market to see what implications that might have for the broader stock market.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:01 | 显示全部楼层
Rounded Reversal Up Underway?
July 8th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today, the US Stock Market may be in the process of completing a ’rounded reversal’ or ’rounded intraday bottom’ before heading higher in a couter-swing back up, which will work off the ‘oversold’ technical condition we’re in.  Let’s look at the charts to see what’s happening.
DIA (Dow Jones ETF) 30 minute chart:

I may have drawn the far right side of the reversal a little more pronounced to the upside than intended, but you can almost feel the shift in ‘power’ or dominance from the sellers to the buyers, as the buyers now have their chance to push the broader indexes higher.
Should this pattern complete, it will signal an orderly intraday transition from selling pressure over to buying pressure in the short term.  Any such rally will be deemed a ‘bear market’ or ‘oversold’ rally, and isn’t expected to have significant strength (meaning do not mistake this for the bottom just yet).
Price has tested and broken above its key 20 and 50 period (30 minute) moving averages and could be working on a temporary bottom or reversal back to the upside.
The 60-minute (hourly) chart shows this a little clearer.

After price plunged through the latter half of July (notice the overnight gap and subsequent “trend day”), price began to form sort of a broadening consolidation pattern, during which time momentum began to diverge to the upside - this was a clue of weakening momentum on the part of the sellers.
Price has now broken above the hourly 50 period EMA and, although we could get a retest back into the ‘value area’ of the consolidation, odds seem solidly in the bullish camp for short-term higher prices.  As such, the short-term outlook on the major indexes has shifted to the bullish side.
This view will be invalidated with a close beneath the $111.50 (Dow 11,500) level, which would be an excellent zone to place a stop if you wanted to play this counter-trend move.
Visit the Market Club and browse their resources for deeper analysis, trade set-ups/signals, and charts (and technical analysis scans) across various stocks and markets.
No Comments | add comment


How Have Global Indexes Held Up So Far?
July 8th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

It’s time to broaden our perspective and view the major market indexes from countries around the world.  How have they performed since the October 2007 US Stock Market Peak?  Let’s review the percentage comparison for insights.

Since the October preak, only Brazil ($BVSP) has held its own, and has now turned negative from the peak after being up as high as 20%.  Brazil is driven largely as a commodity export country, so a large percentage of its performance is due to the price of commodities, which have been remarkably strong until recently.
On the other hand, China ($SSEC), a largely importer country of commodities, has seen the worst performance listed on the chart above, plunging 50% from its 2007 peak.  What would the Federal Reserve and average Americans be saying or doing if the S&P 500 index fell 50% in less than a year?
Keep in mind that the Chinese are hosting this summer’s Olympics, so this development is very interesting given the expectation of large capital inflows from around the world as tourists and spectators visit and pump money into various sectors of the economy - or are the Olympics not as profitable as they have been for countries in years past?
Nevertheless, the French, German, and British indexes have performed very similarly to the S&P 500, with Great Britain ($FTSE) holding up the best (losing only 15% to the S&P’s 20%) and France ($CAC) performing the worst (losing 25%).  The relative performance of these selected countries has been right in line with the S&P for the duration of this chart.
As a bonus, let’s look at the best performer in the graph (Brazil) and compare it to the worst performer (China):
Brazil:

China:

Although many global indexes perform similarly to the US Stock Market, others clearly do not.  You can find opportunity (and risk as well) by diversifying abroad into global market ETFs and stocks.
No Comments | add comment



Fascinating Intraday Action Revealed
July 7th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s intraday price action in the major US Indexes was nothing short of fascinating.  Swift moves caught both longs and shorts off guard, and momentum, velocity, and volatility was high - despite the day ending not far from where it started.
DIA 5-minute chart:

I expected an upside, potential upside reversal bias to the day and began trading as such, happily confirmed by the upside gap and impulse move.
Price then formed a consolidation triangle (range) into the lunch hour, although a few key buy (long) scalps triggered and were successful as price tested and held the 5-minute 20 period moving average.
Price expansion follows consolidation, and so a trend move after lunch was expected, and so it would have been profitable to place buy and sell (entry) stops in a bracketed fashion on the outside of the consolidation zone, but the ideal trade of the day came just after noon when price broke down out of the consolidation pattern, rallied back for a ‘throwback’ trade (red arrow), and then capitulated beneath the key support zones (50 and 200 period moving average, as well as the ‘gap fill’ and yesterday’s close).
A short sell at this time had no justification that price would give such a big win, but we as traders have to be prepared that any trade at any time can either take off strongly in our favor… or against us.
This was an example of why you should always use stops - it just takes one day or one trade like this when you’re on the wrong side to decimate a string of profits.
Nevertheless, price surged to the downside and then formed a consolidation range and a distinct positive momentum divergence - odds shifted to favor higher prices at this zone.
Once price broke back above the 20 period EMA, that signaled a ‘buy’ trade to target at least the 50 period EMA if not higher (aggressively).  Price met and exceeded this objective before running into resistance as expected at the confluence of the 200 period moving average and yesterday’s close (which often serves as a ‘price pivot’).
Price inflected off this level to close in the lower part of its range for the day.
The chart of the QQQQ (NASDAQ ETF) looks similar, only we had a higher close on the day:

Be very careful in your intraday trading strategies - try not to swing for the moon in this whipsaw-filled environment.  Watch your stops and manage your trades closely - this environment calls for precision and steel nerves, as well as quick reflexes.
Do be careful.
No Comments | add comment



Amazing Intraday Plunge
July 7th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The Stock and Index Futures market recently plunged precipitously and are currently trading at session lows due to increased uncertainty about the state of the economy.  Let’s look at the plunge and the pattern preceding it.

The chart shown is the @YMU08 or Dow-Mini futures contract (instead of the DIA, which I normally show).
Price had been steadily trending higher this morning, and then surged to the upside as the market opened and then formed a classic consolidation pattern or roughly symmetrical triangle before absolutely plunging through multiple Support Pivot levels and making a new significant momentum low.
From the triangle apex just under 11,360, price has fallen 146 points (at $5 per contract) in the last 20 minutes (each bar is 5 minutes).  This is a stunning turn of events, and a clear example of why stop-loss orders are essential.  You just never know how far a move will trend against you, and through trading this event, the liquidity just wasn’t there even to get short - it happened so quickly.
This was clearly one of those “if you step away from the computer, you’ll miss it” moments.  It’s a testament to active intraday trade management.
Also, notice how, in strong moves, intraday pivot levels melt away like butter.  The Blue dotted line was the “Daily Pivot” with the next two above it being R1 and R2, and the two below the blue pivot line being S1 and S2.  None were able to sustain the selling fury and intensity of the bears.  As I write this, it appears that S2 is holding, but I can’t remember a time where we’ve fallen from above R2 to S2 in such a short amount of time.
Today indeed is a fascinating day so far.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:01 | 显示全部楼层
Has Gold Broken Upside Resistance?
July 7th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Last week, gold prices broke a set of resistance trendlines, and could be headed higher.  Let’s look at the chart to see the recent developments.
Gold prices (per ounce) daily:

Whether you draw the longer trendline off the closing (or even intraday) highs from mid-March, or of the most recent two swing highs, price indeed broke above both trendlines and above the key 20 and 50 period moving averages, which are currently rising and (technically) in the most bullish orientation possible (20 above the 50 which is above the 200).
Per request, I have added the ‘legend’ or prices section on each chart from StockCharts.com so that you can see exactly where the prices of the key 20, 50, and 200 period moving averages exist at that moment.
Gold could come back and retest the breakout point around $910 per ounce (which is also the confluence of moving average support) before headed higher, but should it break $900 per ounce, odds would then strongly favor a retest of the rising 200 day moving average currently at $870 per ounce.
With Crude Oil having such a stratospheric rise last week, oil could be poised for some sort of retracement, pull-back, or consolidation, which would likely correspond with lower gold prices, especially if the US Dollar Index - which fell last week - strengthened.
Keep your eye closely fixed on the crude oil, gold, and US Dollar markets for clues about what could happen in the broader stock market.
1 Comment | add comment


Quick Weekend Reading
July 6th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Let’s take a look at a few interesting articles or perspective from other bloggers or writers over the past week:
Paul Kedrowski’s “Infectious Greed” lists a fascinating “Dow Jones Returns by President since 1929” which details the compound annual returns.  Where does the current administration lie on the scale?
Barry Ritholtz’s “Big Picture” posts a large “Not Quite a Link-Fest” with numerous links broken down into categories.
Brian Shannon (Alphatrends) does a fascinating quick analysis entitled “Chase the Gap or Wait for the VWAP?
“So you did your nightly research and found what look like some great potential movers for the next day of trading. The next morning you are anxious to take advantage of all the great setups but you look at your stocks and see that some of your strongest trading candidates are gapping higher.”
“Although there is always the exception to the rule, it is usually a suckers bet to purchase the stock as it gaps up.”
Congratulations to Andrew Howowitz (The Disciplined Investor) for being rewarded with a remarkable distinction: Horowitz named “Top Wealth Manager” - AGAIN!
Declan Fallond writes, “Big Money out - only retailers left to dump
Rob Hanna of “Quantifiable Edges” announces the construction of his “Quantifiable Edges Aggregator” and logic behind it, as well as offering a new weekly research newsletter with commentary, signals, and analysis.
The Zignals Blog examines the Google Trend tool in the post “Google Trends: Bull vs Bear relationships“.
(Thank you to the NewsFlashr Business Blog section for quick, easy reading of numerous blog headlines).
No Comments | add comment



Time to Buy AAPL?
July 6th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Is Apple Inc (AAPL) coming up on a short-term buy signal?  Let’s look at the price structure to see.
Let’s start with the weekly chart:

Price may be finding potential support at the rising 20 week moving average, which could set-up a low risk entry (with a stop possibly beneath the 20 period average or (aggressively) beneath the 50 period average.
Volume has been declining throughout most of 2008, and this could be of concern to bulls, but price still remains above the key averages.
The “doji” candle signifies ”indecision’ and often precede turning points in the market.  This doji was preceded by a retracement swing, and price could turn back up from here if the bulls become aggressive.
The daily structure shows a powerful potential buy signal as well:

Though the most recent downward price action was preceded by a negative momentum divergence (not shown), price appears to be finding support at the rising 200 day moving average.
Price is currently trapped between this potentially strong support zone and the confluence of the 20 and 50 day exponential moving averages, as well as a ‘down’ trend-line from teh June highs.
Also, price has formed a ‘doji’ on the daily chart as well.
In this case, a relatively safe trade might be to place a stop beneath the 200 day moving average and either enter currently (for aggressive positioning) or enter long (buy) when price has overcome the moving average and trendline resistance at the $175 per share level.
Keep a watch on this stock, because strength in technology (and Apple) could mean a little boost to the overall market.
3 Comments | add comment



The Fall of Starbucks - SBUX in Three Timeframes
July 5th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

How could the stock of such a well-known company as Starbucks (SBUX) plunge so dramatically in such a short time? Let’s look at the charts to see clues and potentially profitable zones we could have seen on the charts.
Starbucks Monthly:

The structure of the weekly chart shows a very interesting pattern.  The stock languished roughly through 1999 - 2003 before breaking strongly up from a lengthy consolidation base (one could even say ascending triangle pattern).
Price surged to the upside for many consecutive months in a row before forming a temporary ‘euphoric’ or climax top and pulling back to the 20 period monthly moving average to form a sort of bull flag pattern.
In late 2005, price broke upwards out of the retracement and made new highs at $40 per share, again showing large advances before pulling back to the 20 period EMA and inflecting back up.
The key structural change came in late 2006, when price made a “Failure Test” (failed to break to new highs after a valid ‘buy’ signal) and formed a “Double Top” at the $40 level.  Also, there were negative momentum divergences (not shown) at this level.
Price then declined quickly to retest the 20 period EMA, but failed (broke through) this level, setting up a potential test of the 50 period EMA (a sign of a weakening trend - red arrow).  Price did support at the flattening 50 period EMA, though when price broke solidly through this level, all bullish bets were off on this stock and there was no longer any theoretical ’support’.
At this point, volume began to surge to the downside as funds and investors indiscriminately sold shares as fundamental prospects for the company dimmed.  Late 2007 to present has seen only one up-month in the price, which was quickly erased.
Starbucks Weekly:

The weekly chart zooms us in a little closer on the more recent price action, and clues us in to a few more ‘flag’ trades and momentum divergences.
The early 2006 bull flag is a classic pattern to study for educational purposes, as is the subsequent bear flag in April 2006.
The failure test of the $40 per share level looks clearer on this cart, and price has scarcely made any progress to the upside, only to retrace back to the falling 20 week EMA, which set-up key ’short selling’ entries (trades).  From early 2007 to present, price has failed to breach the 20 week EMA with any confidence.
Before you rush out and get too bearish on the stock and start shorting indiscriminately, notice that there’s a rounded bottom forming (more clearly on the daily chart) and a lengthy positive momentum divergence forming.
Volume has absolutely surged to record levels in 2008 (and the end of 2007) as Starbucks has been aggressively distributed.
Finally, the Daily Chart:

You can almost ‘feel’ the momentum shifting from bear to neutral in this chart, as sellers may have used all their power.  Perhaps funds are seeing this stock as fundamentally attractive at these prices, and so potential accumulation is taking place, but that will be clear after the fact.
Price could be forming a ‘Double Bottom” pattern on the daily chart, and could be building a potential base to test monthly and weekly overhead resistance (via the moving averages) at $22 to $24 per share.  Notice that the daily chart would have the 200 period moving average to overcome as its primary resistance, but if bulls can muster a ‘higher high’ at the $19 per share level, we could see a potential trend reversal back up on the daily chart.
Nevertheless, the daily chart shows a wonderful example of a pure downtrend, where the moving average orientation is ideal (20 below the 50, which is below the 200) and price fails to retrace above the falling 50 period EMA (which is an ideal place to select or trail a stop-loss order).
Whether you plan to trade Starbucks or not, the stock serves as an excellent example of chart analysis, trend analysis, and also why you should never hold a stock because “you see the company on every street-corner” or “I see people shop there everyday” or “Everyone knows about the company so the stock can’t go down” or some logic like that.
Prices, even of very well-known companies, can fall and continue falling beyond what your trading/investing account can handle.
Always watch the higher time frame structure to see if there are clues or trends that will help you make more informed decisions on your chosen timeframe of trading activity.
Visit and join the Market Club for more analysis and “trade triangle” signals for Starbucks and any of the stocks you’re watching or trading.
1 Comment | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:02 | 显示全部楼层
Gap Fade Statistics for June
July 4th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Did the “gap fade” technique deliver edge as usual in the month of June for the Dow Jones Index ETF the DIA Diamonds?
Each month I compile the number of trading days in the DIA that had an overnight gap of at least $0.20 (20 Dow Points) and calculate how many of those gaps filled throughout the same trading day, in an attempt to discover and calculate the edge in the classic “Fade the Gap” (trade against the gap as the morning play) strategy.
For the month of June, there were 17 gaps (of 22 trading days) for a huge percentage of 77% of the trading days resulted in an overnight gap of at least $0.20.
Of these 17 gaps, 10 morning gaps filled intraday, giving the gap fade strategy an ‘edge’ of 58.82%.
Looking deeper:
There were 9 “Up” gaps (despite the downward pressure in June) and 7 of these up-gaps filled for a percentage of 77.27%.
There were 8 “Down” gaps for the month, and only 3 such gaps filled for a percentage of 37.5%.
June showed clear and almost relentless downside pressure as evidenced in the gap-fade study.
Additional Trivia:
There were 8 gaps (6 up gaps; 2 down gaps) greater than $0.50 (50 Dow Points) and 4 of these gaps filled for a percentage of 50%.
Only one day opened with a gap greater than $1.00 (100 Dow points) and it did not fill (6/20/08).
Prior Months’ Gap Fade Statistics Reports:
January Gap Fade Statistics
February Gap Fade Statistics
March Gap Fade Statistics
April Gap Fade Statistics
May Gap Fade Statistics
No Comments | add comment


Oil, Oil, Oil. Pullbacks Lead to Higher Prices
July 3rd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Crude Oil has been, and is currently, the focus of an extraordinary amount of coverage in the media, and is a dominant topic at the watercoolers and at home.  Ask anyone you see and odds are they have a strong opinion about high crude oil (or gasoline) prices - and it’s probably strongly negative.
This year has been quite exceptional for the crucial commodity - only 8 weeks have shown negative prices, and if you count since February 2008, the commodity has only seen 5 down (negative) weeks.  That is remarkable for any stock or commodity, given that roughly 25 weeks have transpired so far in 2008.
On the daily chart, any pullback (retracement) - which has usually resembled some sort of flag continuation pattern, has led to the expected ‘measured move’ price objective.  Let’s look at the powerful positive price action in Crude Oil this year so far.

I highlighted the late March ‘flag’ pattern which had a measured move price projection to around $125, and I remember taking ‘heat’ for that projection (Price will never go that far!) and even feeling slightly silly for making that projection, but indeed that’s what happened.
Price retraced in late May only to complete yet another measured move flag style pattern.
At the end of May, price created a more powerful (and more pronounced) bear flag which met its price objective violently and rapidly two days later (when oil had a record two-day price move).
Price consolidated through most of June,  but has now broken a rectangle consolidation (or flat-line bear flag) which has a potential price objective (measured move) of roughly $150 (the measured move is estimated and simplified to be $15).  That’s currently $6 away (of course there’s no way to know for sure whether it will achieve that target).
Higher gasoline prices are causing consumers and businesses to cut back on purchases and trips they otherwise would have taken, which means there’s less money flowing in the economy, which - obviously - puts a drag on the broader US and Global Stock Market Indexes.
One would think that with all this media attention and virtual ‘one-sided’ bullishness on the price of oil, that the contrarian mentality would prevail and prices would at least come off a little, but there’s so much going on from a supply/demand (fundamental) and ‘price discovery’ or speculation/trader driven moves (including momentum players) that it could be very difficult to turn this trend easily.
And so we continue to watch the struggle unfold - and realize the effects and possible opportunities within this environment for our trading and investment accounts.
No Comments | add comment



US Steel Shows False Breakout and Reversal
July 2nd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Shockingly to me and many traders, US Steel (X) violated a breakout pattern in a strong uptrend to create a reversal and strong plunge, suddenly invalidating the pattern and shattering support in a short period of time.

US Steel broke a potential triple top and horizontal resistance pattern at the $185 per share level, drawing in anxious buyers and forcing shorts to cover their positions.
Shortly after the break, price retested the breakout zone, which actually set up a higher probability trade because it prevented the need to ‘chase’ price, and it also gave a clear stop-loss level just under the breakout zone, or in this case also beneath the rising 20 period moving average.
All bullishness evaporated as the stock plunged over the last two sessions to take out both the breakout zone support, 20 and 50 period daily EMA support, and the lows of the consolidation pattern (resembling a rectangle) support.
Also, yesterday’s sell-off was accompanied by the highest volume level the chart recorded saw so far - not a good sign for the bulls, as today’s action is showing us.
The intraday chart shows two bear flag patterns and a strong down-trend for educational purposes:

This stock ’scorched’ the buyers by reversing after a valid buy signal (resistance break) and shows us that we as traders deal in probabilities - never certainties.  Even if we perceive the odds of a successful trade at being 75%, there is still a 25% chance the trade will fail and take out our stop.
This is where money and risk management come in to help make a trader have a higher chance at success than not.
Study valid trades that fail, and try not to be upset when a valid set-up results in a stop-loss.
You cannot win every trade, unfortunately.
1 Comment | add comment



RIMM Inflects off 200 Day - How Far Will it Go?
July 2nd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Research in Motion (RIMM) was in the news prominently last week as the stock plunged after slightly missing earnings expectations.  The stock has now found temporary support about its 200 day moving average.  How far will the bounce go?

The logical reaction after a large volatility momentum move down is an inflection (retracement) back to key moving averages, which would be located around $130 per share.  Today’s intraday action has the stock falling back for a potential retest of the 200 day average, which would be a bearish development - violation of the 200 day average would likely be a strong sell signal for funds and other traders who may have stops beneath that key level.
Nevertheless, should price retrace back to the upside, there are a few key price levels to keep in mind:
Again, the $130 per share confluence of the 20 and 50 period EMAs
The 38.2% Fibonacci retracement is at $126.75
The 50.0% Fibonacci retracement is at $130.80
The 62.8% Fibonacci retracement is at $134.84
(These numbers are close approximations)
Notice again that the $130 per share level would seem to favor a strong potential for resistance for this stock in the short-term - that area was also support (horizontal) line previously, and support - once broken - can become resistance.
Keep your eye on this stock and what it might mean for the broader market, and do be careful if you’re trading this highly volatile stock in any aggressive capacity.
1 Comment | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:03 | 显示全部楼层
Shocker of a Day! Intraday Action Revealed
July 1st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today was quite the interesting and surprising day in the major US Indexes.  Why?  They flip-flopped more than a politician campaigning.  Let’s reveal the intraday action and see if there’s anything we can learn from today’s action.
DIA - Dow Jones 5-min chart:

There really is so much to say about today’s action.  Let’s start with the obvious - the Gap Fade.
The first play when there’s an overnight gap is to try to fade the gap back to yesterday’s closing price.  This strategy tends to have dual edge in the form of producing winning trades more than 50% of the time, and producing larger winners than losers.  This was the case today, despite a relatively large gap (greater than 100 Dow points).  I have trouble fading such gaps with confidence, but odds still tend favor filling over not.
After a large volatility bar took you to a profitable exit, the market rolled back over sharply to the downside as expected, but then rocketed unexpectedly back to the upside, leaving many traders (especially those with tight stops) bewildered.
Price then found resistance at yesterday’s close (which is the expected play after a gap) and then formed a ’shooting star’ bearish candle before rolling back over strongly in the direction of the original gap.
After making new lows on the day past noon, a positive momentum divergence formed, and a small consolidation pattern, which I interpreted at the time (especially on the SPY chart) to be a sort of bear-flag pattern, which actually broke strongly and shockingly to the upside, triggering a ‘range expansion’ trade (though in the opposite direction as expected).  That’s why it’s often critical to wait for the break of a consolidation pattern because it’s impossible to know which direction price will break.
After surging higher than expected, and violating key moving averages to the upside, price rotated back to the downside before ramping back up into the close - with all the wild action, the fact remains that the market closed on its highs of the day, providing a bullish catalyst, especially in the face of potential Fibonacci support from the monthly 38% retracement.
The SPY chart tells a similar story, though I have added a few more annotations:

For those keeping track at home, the 1,260 level on the S&P 500 chart represents the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement off the 2002 bear market lows.  Coincidence?  My guess is that many funds had buy orders at that level and see it as a bargain area and expect selling to cease there - temporarily, it did.  Let’s see if that level holds.
The S&P 500 was 4 points away from making a new low for 2008.  Surprisingly (or not so much), the hammer candlestick at these levels represents a strong short-term buy signal (in addition to the oversold signals registering on most oscillators).  Don’t be surprised to see a (potentially strong) bounce off these levels.
Remember that trading will be light during this holiday week, so market moves may be wild and volatile.
Be safe out there, no matter what your bias remains on the overall indexes - there’s risk in playing the market both ways here.
No Comments | add comment


What are the Monthly Index Charts Revealing?
July 1st, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Last month was the worst June since the Depression - the Dow fell 10% in one month alone.  Let’s look at the structure of the monthly index charts to see what their story tells us about the possible future.
Dow Jones:

The key feature of this chart is that price has closed beneath the rising 50 period EMA for the first time since 2003.  Also, there is no longer any moving average support from the key 20 or 50 month moving averages.  Two times in 2008, the 50 period average served to halt the market declines (which magically corresponded with the Fed bail-out in both occasions… but there were also likely program buys at those levels).  This time, buyers were unable to overcome supply.
The path of least resistance now appears to be to the downside on a longer-term basis, and the closing of the month of June has declared a more ominous sign:  It officially confirmed a downtrend in the Dow Jones Index (in terms of a lower low in January, a lower high in March, and taking out the lower low in June).
The situation looks slightly more sinister on the S&P 500.

Although the Dow is just slightly under its January 2000 peak (at around 11,750), the S&P is clearly and undeniably beneath its 2000 peak (at 1,550).
The past appears to be repeating itself in this chart, with price first failing at the 20 period moving average, supporting at the 50 period, and then crashing through it for the next two years (it served as resistance in early 2002).
Price has broken its rising 50 period moving average and is around 30 points shy on making new lows for the year, but taking out the lower (intramonth) low from March.  On a closing price basis, the market has already taken out its closing low.
Also, notice volume in all indexes has surged above its yearly average, as we can see increased participation, but also increased urgency as prices have fallen.
The S&P is down 8.6% for the month - not as poor a showing as the Dow, but stunning for long-term investors nonetheless.
Continue to monitor the larger (primary) trend very closely, and note that its structure will help shape analysis and opinions of direction on the shorter or intermediate timeframes.
Join the MarketClub for daily analysis and charting signals, and access to educational videos on various investment/trading topics important to short-term and long-term traders/investors.
To test drive full access to the MarketClub services for two weeks, sign up for a free two-week trial via this link - but hurry if you have not done so already; the once-a-year offer expires midnight July 2nd.
No Comments | add comment



Monday’s Intraday Trading Tactics
June 30th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s action slammed both bulls and bears… more than once!  It was another rough trading day, which can be expected during the summer months of low (relative) volume.  Let’s view some of the price structure trades that could have been taken, in an effort to familiarize ourselves and trade more appropriately next time.
Let’s use the DIA 5-min chart as our trading proxy:

They day ended as a ‘doji’ or ‘indecision’ day (which could also be called a range or consolidation day).  Also, the day was just shy of being classified as an ‘inside’ day on the daily chart.
The day opened on all the indexes with an opening gap, which was quickly filled.  The range was around 150 Dow points ($1.50 DIA) which allowed plenty of trading opportunities, though not all trades ‘worked’ as expected.
1. With a new momentum low and a large impulse down, one would expect price to inflect off yesterday’s close, which also happened to correspond with the 20 and 50 period moving average.  A proper trade was to short at this level.  Unfortunately, not all trades work and the market is beyond our control, so after a slight red candle (triggering short-sales), the market rocketed higher to make a new momentum high on the day and stop-out all those properly executed short trades.
2. Momentum then began to diverge negatively, as price failed to clear the $114.20 level with any conviction, and a triangle consolidation pattern formed on the index, which set-up a ‘breakaway’ or ‘range expansion’ trade - in this case, price expanded to the downside, as was hinted by the negative divergence.
3. Price formed a large volatility move down which found support at yesterday’s close, setting up the short-sell exit and triggering a potential ‘buy’ trade to target the moving average consolidation zone, which worked quickly.  Price then formed a 45 degree angle movement (retracement) back up, which set up the final structural point of the day.
4. The violation of the parallel trendlines signaled entry for a ‘bear flag’ or ‘measured move (A to B equals C to D) style trade which targeted the $113.20 area (which was achieved quicker than expected).  One could have also targeted yesterday’s close as a potential ‘trade exit’ or target.
It was an interesting day with clean set-ups, but not all ‘idealized’ trades worked as planned, which is fine.  It was a relatively difficult day in the indexes, but all in all, price failed to close far from where it opened.
No Comments | add comment



Gold Intraday Descending Triangle Break Example
June 30th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Gold prices and the Gold ETF (GLD) broke an interesting descending triangle early this morning that I wanted to highlight to you.
GLD 5-minute chart (StreetTracks Gold Trust Shares):

Price began the day with a morning gap that was almost instantly faded for the opening trade.
Price then rebounded off Friday’s close and the 50 period moving average, which set-up another short-term ’scalp’ trade, but failed to reach above the intraday high, and inflected back down to retest the rising 50 EMA and yesterday’s close, and then began to consolidate into a tight coil with numerous doji candles forming close by (red arrow).
At this point, you could have drawn the converging trendlines which set-up the descending triangle classical chart pattern and either
1.  Entered aggressively (short) inside the triangle, in anticipation of a break
2.  Entered conservatively (short) once the break occurred.
In either case, your stop would have been above the upper trendline (wherever you were comfortable) and the target would have been set for a ‘measured move’ of the height of the ‘right’ triangle, which was around $91.00 (the corresponding value for the futures contract @YG would have been $910 per ounce).
In this case, momentum carried price further to the downside than expected, and overshot the target by $0.40 ($4.00 for the @YG).
Price then found support about the rising 200 period moving average and then inflected back up to retest higher moving averages.
For reference, a negative momentum divergence and a Low ADX reading (less than 15) preceded the triangle and eventual breakdown.  This example serves as a reference for a classic descending right triangle and appropriate intraday trading tactics.
No Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:04 | 显示全部楼层
Weekly Index Fly-by
June 30th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

With a new week upon us, let’s take a quick look at where the major US Indexes stand.
Dow Jones:

The Dow has violated its 200 day moving average, and volume has accelerated as price has fallen through June.  Price also has formed a new momentum low on the chart - in real terms, this means that the distance between a 3 period and 10 period exponential moving average is greater than 400 points.
Price is indeed in a confirmed downtrend, as evidenced by the series of lower lows and lower highs.
Also, price has completed its ‘measured move’ pattern which resembled a bear flag (not drawn on this chart, but drawn on the S&P 500).  As bearish as it may look, recall that prices never go down (or up) forever or even indefinitely - there are always counterswings.
NASDAQ:

The NASDAQ actually created a larger ‘measured move’ target, which appears to be only half-way complete.
Volume has been relatively flat since March 08, but appears to be increasing as price tests lower levels.  The 200 day moving average could provide temporary support, but if the ‘measured move’ is the dominant pattern, expect price to test the 2,050 levels not seen since 2006.  It would be remarkable if the bulls could defend price here at the 200 day average.
S&P 500:

Looking very similar to the Dow, the S&P 500 chart also is just shy of completing its measured move (bear flag style pattern).  Price also has violated the 200 day ‘line in the sand’ moving average which some funds and investors use as a ‘benchmark’ to determine whether or not a stock (or index) is in an up or down trend (especially for strategy testing where ‘trend’ needs to be defined objectively).
Price is also shy of making a new momentum low, and is testing new low territory (not seen since 2006) on increased volume.
The larger structure of the weekly charts on the US Equity Indexes is not promising for the bulls currently.  This shortened week of potentially low volatility could create a large swing, but I would suppose that not much - save a large economic announcement - will happen this week, so that traders can digest what’s happened last week and throughout June.
“End of the Quarter” Window Dressing officially ends today, so there may be a slight effect of this pattern unwinding into the new quarter as funds and traders start afresh, or at least try to do so.
July brings in a new month and a new quarter, and could prove to be interesting.
No Comments | add comment


A Few Sunday Reading Links
June 29th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

With the upcoming week being a shortened week, and many traders being on vacation, let’s look at a few links and blog posts to get us started as we prepare for the upcoming week.
Big Picture: Why Does -20% = Bear Market?
“Best as I can figure, the 20% number is a not-quite-a-random number — more than a 10% correction, less than a full blown crash (which for all we know, could be “offically” 30%).”
“Rather than focus on terminology, investors should be considering their risk management strategies, what they are doing to preserve capital, and how they are psychologically prepared to deal with what could be an extended downturn.”
Big Picture:No Fear
“S&P500 investors are on the verge of experiencing something not seen for a very long time — a losing decade. If markets continue their losing streak for a few more months, that is a realistic possibility. The S&P500 is now down 4.8% since June of 1999. To hit the decade mark, the SPX would need to be below the 1998 close of 1,229 — less than 50 points below Friday’s close of 1278.38 come December 31st. This has not occurred since the 1930s.”
Dr. Steenbarger: Four Lessons I’ve Learned From Coaching Hedge Fund Portfolio Managers
1.  Success is Individualized
2.  The Game is Different
3.  The Environment Matters
4.  Success Starts at the Beginning

Infectious Greed:Worst Dow Jones Junes Since Depression”
Disciplined Investor:On Oil and Manipulation
Chris Perruna: Market Snapshot“  Excellent charts all worth viewing.
Abnormal Returns:  “Hot Money Mess (Links)”
Crossing Wall Street: “Deconstructing the Dow”
Quantifiable Edges:Does A Lackadaisical Put/Call Keep The Market From Bouncing?
“…two studies that show what has happened when negative price action has been accompanied by a lackadaisical put/call”
Adam’s Daily Options Report: Deconstructing the…… Un-Deconstructable.
Good assessment on Jim Cramer’s recent bad call on RIMM and his deconstruction of what he (thinks he) actually said (but didn’t).
“Gaming earnings heads on can lead to particularly disastrous results. But it’s never about the bad pick, anyone who has ever touched a stock knows we all make mistakes.”
Declan Fallond (Zignals Blog):S&P Moving Average Behavior
“I decided to take a look at the relationships between the 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day MAs with respect to each other and the current value of the S&P to see if there was in any predictive value as to what may follow over the coming months.”
Be safe next week if you’re traveling… or trading.  Be extra careful if you’re traveling AND trading.


No Comments | add comment



Comparison of RIMM, AAPL, and GOOG
June 28th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Technology stocks have been in the news lately, so let’s take a quick look at three very popular stocks showing similar patterns:  Research in Motion (RIMM), Apple Inc (AAPL) and Google (GOOG):
RIMM Daily:

RIMM missed earnings slightly, which sent traders punishing the stock mercilessly, plunging it beneath its strong trendlines and key moving averages.  A ‘flat’ momentum divergence preceded the drop.
Clearly, investors wanted more than they got from this stock, and sent prices lower, shocking many individuals.  Nevertheless, from an educational standpoint, notice all the clean buy signals generated from rests of the rising 20 and 50 period moving averages (black arrows) prior to the large volatile drop. The 200 day moving average could be a potential support for price.
I’m not sure anyone saw a drop of this magnitude coming, but clearly playing ahead of earnings on volatile technology stocks can be harmful to your account.  I advocate stepping aside ahead of earnings and then playing the earnings reaction.
AAPL Daily:

Apple stock, since the announcement of the new iPhone, has been under pressure, and is now testing (successfully so far) the rising 200 day moving average.  This level is the target for any short-seller, and is a potential buy signal for Apple bulls who aren’t already long.
Should price fall beneath the 200 day, it would become difficult to be an Apple bull (short term), but I suspect the bulls will make a valiant effort and could rally price at this point.  Also, volume has been declining through the selling, which is theoretically bullish.  There is also a mini-positive momentum divergence as price made its recent low (momentum did not confirm the new price low).
GOOG Daily:

Unlike RIMM and AAPL, Google actually has fallen beneath its key moving averages and could be breaking a bearish descending triangle pattern and could be headed lower in a potential attempt to close the gap (or at least part of it).
Price formed a ‘hammer’ or ‘dragonfly doji’ which could be a bullish pattern - any rise above $550 would temporarily invalidate the bearish descending triangle and pop price back above its key 50 and 20 period moving averages, which would shift price back into the bullish camp, but continuation to the downside, especially if sellers can break price beneath $500, would set us up for a trek to lower prices.
Like AAPL, momentum is making a small mini-positive divergence as Google hit a new swing low.
Use higher time frames on these key stocks for deeper analysis, but always trade them with respect for their volatility.
1 Comment | add comment



Friday’s Intraday Index Trading Tactics
June 27th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Friday’s action almost turned out to be another trend day down, but a recovery into the close prevented this development.  Let’s look at some of the idealized trades we could have taken during the day, to learn more about these patterns should they develop soon in the future.
The DIA - 5-minute:

The day began with a 10-minute move down, which was corrected into a very high-probability, low risk trade as price retraced both to the falling 5-minute EMA and yesterday’s close (which often can serve as support/resistance).  A doji candle also confirmed the high probability trade (short).
A second trade, and second doji formed around 10:30 with the same logic.  The target is just beneath the most recent swing low with a stop conservatively above the 20 period EMA or aggressively above the falling 50 period EMA.
The third ideal trade could be described as a ‘bear flag’ trade, which I draw on the SPY chart below.  Price breached the falling 20 period EMA, but failed to test the falling 50, giving a little ‘heat’ to the trade, but ultimately price broke down sharply to make new lows on the day.
At this time, a three-swing positive momentum divergence formed, which clued you in that the odds of lower prices had been reduced, and momentum may be ending to the downside.  In fact, we got a reversal off the lows to form a new momentum high, and price languished beneath the falling 50 period EMA into the weekly close.  Also, the breach of the 50 would have signaled the exit for any core position you put on in anticipation of today’s action being a trend day.
The SPY chart is very similar, only I highlighted the “Bear Flag” or “measured move” portion.

The SPY actually threatened the falling 50 period EMA more than once, but never violated it until after 2:00 following the momentum divergence which formed the new momentum high.  Price ultimately found resistance into the close from yesterday’s closing price.
Annotate your own charts of the stocks and markets you trade for the “idealized trades” based on your understanding of price action, so that you can recognize key patterns or set-ups in real time and have more confidence in trading them.
2 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:04 | 显示全部楼层
How Did General Motors Lose its Edge in the Marketplace?
June 27th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

General Motors (GM) hit a 52-year low yesterday, and isn’t showing much signs of a technical or fundamental recovery.  How did the stable blue-chip company go astray?
Let’s peek at the chart:

To be fair to GM, let’s compare it to Ford Motor Company (F) to see a very similar chart, though Ford is only retesting levels not seen since 1992.

GM is down 33% for the month of June so far, and Ford is down 26%.  The effects of higher gas prices have indeed affected these stocks, but why so dramatically?
Rather than go into a lengthy discussion, I wanted to highlight analysis written by Adam Hewison on his Market Club Blog that details some of the strategic blunders (like scapping plans for an electronic car in 2002) in his ironically titled posting “What’s Good for General Motors is Good for America.”
To highlight some of Hewison’s discussion, I included some of the following revealing quotes:
“What’s interesting is that high point in the stock was right around the time GM scrapped its EV1 car (chart is from Market Club).”

“General Motors tends to make most of its money on sales of replacement parts. Up to 40% of its profits come from selling replacement parts for existing GM automobiles, so why would they sabotage their own cash flow?”
“This may be one of the biggest blunders ever in American corporate history. GM took the lead in electric car technology (smart move), but was not convinced that they as a company could be profitable selling electric cars.”
Check out Hewison’s full post, which includes a sample trading strategy test results of GM trading tactics and a savvy concluding quote.
5 Comments | add comment


Trading Today’s Large Trend Day
June 26th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

After forming two seim-dojis in a row (indicating relative indecision), the market unveiled a pure trend day today, allowing quick and steady profits for those who were ready to trade it for all it was worth.
How might you have traded today’s trend day? Let’s look.

The odds were slightly higher that a trend day could occur, given the two prior candle patterns (not shown) which signaled indecision.  Also, the market tends to consolidate prior to a “Fed Day” announcement and then trend following this consolidation.
To be honest, I expected the trend day to trade upwards, as the Dow tested the prior lows after an oversold condition, but that was not the case - it’s far easier to anticipate a trend day, and more difficult to predict in which direction it will occur.  As intraday traders, it’s sometimes better to come into the trading day with an open mind and then play the situation as it happens.
In most cases (this being no exception) a trend day is preceded by a range contraction day and then opens with an opening gap that refuses to fill.  In this case, if the “gap fade” trade gave you no satisfaction, odds are that the day’s action will unfold in a true trend day, meaning virtually any (short) position you take will be profitable, as the price is expected to close on the day’s lows.
The moment you decide that a trend day might be developing, establish a “core” position and then trade swing scalps on any retracement to the falling 20 period EMA.  Place your stops above the falling 50 period EMA - I always use the 5-minute chart.
Because of the structure of the day, feel free to use leverage on entering during the retracements and play for small, high probability targets with a larger position for added profits.
For reference, the chart of the SPY (S&P 500) was almost identical to the DIA:

Trend days occur relatively rarely, but they can offer outsized profits if you’re aware of the structure and how to take advantage of the price behavior with confidence.
Study today’s action for your own insights and clues as to what you could have done better, so that you can take advantage of the developing structure in real time.
(Hint, I make no reference in the post to breadth, TICK, TRIN, $VIX, sectors, volume - all of which can be used to raise your confidence that the day’s action will unfold in a true trend day)
No Comments | add comment



Dow Breaks March Lows - Tests 2008 Lows
June 26th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

This looks bad for the bulls.  The Dow Jones Index broke its 2008 closing low today, and has broken its 2008 lows made in January.  The overall trend is down, and momentum appears to be accelerating.

The roughly 14% rally off the March lows has now been confirmed as a “Bear Market Rally,” in which it served sellers with a better opportunity to sell and tricked buyers into believing everything was ok with the market.
As of 10:30 EST, the Dow Jones was only 13 points away from making a new low for 2008, which would take us to a price low not seen since September, 2006.
UPDATE:  As of 12:15 EST, price had indeed clearly taken out the prior lows and made new lows for the year.
Momentum appears to be picking up to the downside, as this test became more evident as prices trended lower since the failure test at the 200 day moving average.  This was the next logical target for the market.
Instead of getting aggressively bearish here, we need to wait and see if these lows will hold, or if there will be some sort of surprise announcement by the Fed or the Government that will save the market once again.  In Janurary, it was the .75% rate cut.  In March, it was the Bear Stearns bail-out.
Let’s view the S&P 500, and note that it has a little more ‘room to run’ before testing and potentially making new lows on the year.

The chart is very similar to the Dow, only price has a few more percentage points to test ‘new price low’ territory.  The two S&P targets are the March closing low, and the March intraday low.
Also, these levels correspond closely with the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement on both the Dow and the S&P monthly chart, when taken from the prior ‘bear market’ price low to the 2007 price top.
Approximate 38.2% Fibonacci retracement levels from the prior lows:
S&P 500: 1,267
Dow Jones:  11,523
NASDAQ: 2890

For guidance and trading ideas beyond the stock market (including futures and currencies), check out the Market Club if you have not done so already.  They have graciously extended their free two-week full access trial offer because the interest was so high.  Take advantage of this offer, as it costs you nothing and provides you access to daily commentaries, unique charts, potential buy/sell signals, deep scanning software, a daily blog, educational videos, and much more.
Both short-sellers and buyers need to beware, because anything could happen.
No Comments | add comment



Market Loved, Hated the Fed Decision
June 25th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

As evidenced by today’s intraday price action, you’d think the market either had schizophrenia or was potentially bi-polar.  Once the decision to hold interest rates unchanged at 2%, the market swung sharply four times before settling down for the close.  Was there any chance of profit in this volatilty?  Let’s look.
The NASDAQ QQQQ ETF:

At first glance, it looks like a jumbled mess.  The NASDAQ gapped up and then appeared to be forming some sort of trend day, and we had the expected major price consolidation prior to the actual decision at 2:00 EST.
Price then broke the consolidation patterh and surged to the upside, happy at the decision.  But like I said earlier today, be sure to parse out the words and meaning that was spoken, especially if the Fed spent too much time talking about inflationary concerns.
As such, the markret swung back hard against its initial direction, but changed its mind once again and surged stronger to the upside before forming a quick top and long-legged dojis (gravestone dojis, to be exact) and plunged back to where it was prior to the Fed decision.
The volatility did offer the potential to make money studying order flow and ultra-short term direction, but it was an exercise best left to professionals, and not for ‘at home’ retail traders.  Quote screens flash constantly and fills are often not given at expected prices, and emotion causes us to buy after a run-up and then hold through a sell-off, only to sell at or near the bottom.  It’s so much harder than the price chart above shows.
Try trading a Fed day reaction with a practice account a few times before trading the day live.  There’s often at least three large volatile swings that can reverse direction on a dime, leaving you trapped.
Let’s look at the Dow Jones (DIA) to see the similar pattern.

The only major difference between the two charts is that the Dow closed roughly where it opened, forming a gravestone doji/hammer on the daily chart.  Normally interpreted as a bearish signal, this reversal signal comes not only after yesterday’s doji, but at potential support from the March lows.
Trading a Fed day reaction is very difficult, and requires iron nerves and quick reflexes and a willingness to tolerate rapid swings both in and against your favor.  If you desire to trade these moves, get plenty of experience before trading large positions in these environments.
3 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-23 05:05 | 显示全部楼层
Watch What the Fed Says, Not What it Does Today
June 25th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

Today’s decision will be more about tone than action - about words than a policy decision.
The Fed is expected to keep overnight rates locked at 2%, though some may begin to discuss the threat of inflation on the economy, and may be trying to “jawbone” or threaten action if inflation numbers continue to be unacceptable.
The Fed walks a tightrope today, in that cutting rates would help a struggling economy by making capital easier to borrow, but “lose money policies” can help stoke inflation by weakening the dollar and increasing demand for commodities (in an expansionary environment).
Generally, to ‘tame’ inflation, the Fed will raise interest rates and employ a “tight” money policy, which could restrict access to capital (higher rates equal higher interest payments on loans), but higher rates strengthen the Dollar and help (try to) reduce demand on commodities.
When the Fed is raising rates, typically the Economy can ‘handle’ the reduced access to capital - now, many people believe it is unlikely that it can, and there is a debate across the country as to whether we’re already in a recession, on the brink of a recession, or just slowing down.  Few people can say that “everything is fine and the Economy is firing on all cylinders” anymore.
I wanted to quote a few lines from the article “Watch What the Fed Says…” from CNN Money editor/author Paul La Monica:
“With inflation fears on the rise, there is growing speculation that the Fed may begin to raise rates as soon as its next meeting on Aug. 5. Many economists think that would be soon, however, because the economy is still in a precarious state, and higher rates would kill any chance for a recovery.”
La Monica gives us three specific things to watch for in the speech this afternoon, including:
  • Bernanke using the phrase, “Substantial Easing and Moderate Growth.”
  • Bernanke using the phrase “Inflation risks” more times than necessary.
  • Any discussion about the US Dollar
The market today has already risen strongly prior to the meeting.
Remember that “Fed Days,” even days when “nothing happens,” can be volatile, and often involve an extremely large volatile move up, down, or up then down after the meeting as traders parse through exactly what was said and meant.
Today, parsing his words will be more important than ever before.
For additional reading:
Dr. Steenbarger’s post, Market Views Ahead of the Fed.
Kirk Report:  “Fed Day”
“The first reaction tends to be a false one, but nevertheless with the market looking for something to get us moving again, we should anticipate a sizable move.”

No Comments | add comment


Alert: Dow Tests March Lows Today
June 24th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The Dow Jones Industrial Average tested the March closing low today, with a large, sudden plunge to the test and a solid recovery (so far) off this level.  The market is at a very critical juncture now.
The ‘zoomed in’ daily chart:

Price gapped lower this morning and then careened to test the March 2008 closing low at 11,731.  Today’s intraday low actually was marked (so far) at 11,725.  Price has since recovered strongly off this ‘bottom’ zone, but it will be absolutely critical to watch what happens next.
For fun, let’s look at the intraday chart as it has developed so far of the Dow:

I was trading short and noticed an extreme ‘pocket’ where price just fell about 20 points (on the @YM Dow-mini) contract in a matter of seconds.  I exited the position, figuring this could be a selling climax of some sort, and then looked down to the daily chart to note this level had been tested.
I honestly didn’t expect this level to be hit so soon.  Had I prepared just a little more in advance and written the number down, I could have been a little more prepared for the possibility, especially given the Fed meets tomorrow and could help send the market higher or lower by their decision (or wording of it).
It helps to write down potential levels from higher time frames that the market may ‘gun for’ or attempt to test throughout the day.  Of course, the previous day’s high and low often come into play, but sometimes important structural points on the higher time frames (such as a test of a longer term high or low or support/resistance line) will become the dominant expected play for the day.
The actual annual low of the year for the Dow is set at 11,634 in late January (but that was an intraday price only - the March lows represent more stable prices as the market actually closed at those levels, rather than testing them intraday).
A quick note on higher time frame levels:
The Weekly 50 period EMA, upon which price tested and inflected upwards today, stands at 11,772.
The 38.2% Fibonacci retracement off the 2003 bottom (monthly chart) is 11,606.
If you think the market is headed higher from this point, place a trade and utilize a close stop beneath these lows for a very outsided high reward to risk ratio, and if you think the market could head lower, wait just a few more days to see what effort the bulls (buyers) put into this test and if the critical level holds.  If not, short with confidence (or buy inverse ETF funds if need be).
Watch these levels very closely no matter what timeframe you trade primarily.  Things could get very interesting….
3 Comments | add comment



Utilities Holding their Own
June 24th, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

The Utilities Sector (XLU) has shown relative strength in the background of the recent market downswing, and still trades in a respective chart position.  Let’s look at its chart and its comparison to the S&P 500.
XLU - Utilities Daily Chart:

Since the March lows, price has steadily and comfortably trended upwards, and price now trades above its 20 and 50 day moving average, and the ‘moving average orientation’ is in the most bullish scenario (20 above 50 above 200).  This is an interesting development, but not one that is unexpected.
Utility stocks tend to do well in environments of low interest rates and poorer in times of relatively ‘high’ interest rates because they are required to borrow so much money to construct infrastructure and keep operations running.  Thus, they benefit from lower rates of lending.
Also, they tend to be ‘defensive’ areas for long-only investors to buy in times of economic uncertainty or market downturns, due to their high dividend rates and stable charts (you don’t see a utility stock making such wild swings like a Google or Apple or other technology stock).
One word of caution is that many are expecting the Federal Reserve to begin raising rates, probably sometime later in the year, so this could hurt these stocks which are holding up during the market downturn.
Let’s look at the chart of the comparison between the S&P 500 and the Utility Sector, including its relative strength, which has just experienced a positive trendline break.

Notice that the S&P (blue line) has slightly outperformed the XLU (red and black line) until recently, when the sector ‘held its own’ as the market fell.  This created the positive trendline break in the Relative Strength chart and could lead to further outperformance should the market continue falling.
Continue to look for safer opportunities here, but they won’t be as exciting or volatile as other positions in popular stocks that are discussed widely in the media each day.
No Comments | add comment



US Steel Melts Resistance
June 23rd, 2008 by Corey Rosenbloom

US Steel (X) broke a resistance level today, which could signal higher prices yet to come for this basic materials sector stock.
Daily chart:

Although momentum seemed to be diverging, the indicator broke a trendline just ahead of the eventual price break above the $185 resistance zone.  The stock has had an impressive run over the previous three sessions, and bulls were finally able to drive price through this zone with little resistance.  Volume increased on the prior two sessions, hinting that the upper resistance level had higher odds of ‘melting away’ than holding.
The stock could find resistance at the $200 (round number) per share level, but otherwise there seems to be a clear pathway to that level now that overhead supply has (apparently) been resolved.
Note:  The Blue arrow in the middle of the chart represents a high probability swing or position trade, in that the stock had performed a momentum trend move (evidenced by the new momentum high) and then retraced back to the rising 20 period moving average.  With a stop just beneath this average, an entry close to the average, and a target well beyond (or, in the case of a position trade, exiting when price does break this average convincingly), this would be a good example of a high probability trade with potential edge over time.
Basic Materials/Industrials have been strong through 2008.  Will they continue to be so?
US Steel (X) is the top metals fabrication company by market cap, at $22.22 billion.
Other stocks in the Metals Fabrication Industry - ranked by market cap - include:
Precision Cast Parts (PCP)
Reliance Steel (RS)
Valmont Industries (VMI) - profiled recently on the blog
Matthews International (MATW)

Source:  Yahoo Finance
2 Comments | add comment



« Previous PageNext Page »
金币:
奖励:
热心:
注册时间:
2006-7-3

回复 使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

本站声明:MACD仅提供交流平台,请交流人员遵守法律法规。
值班电话:18209240771   微信:35550268

举报|意见反馈|手机版|MACD俱乐部

GMT+8, 2025-7-22 07:54 , Processed in 0.074667 second(s), 11 queries , MemCached On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表