September 18, 2004CYCLICALS OUTPERFOMING STAPLESBy Chip Anderson
Arthur Hill
There is a most interesting development between the Consumer Discretionary SPDR (XLY) and the Consumer Staple SPDR (XLP). Relative to the S&P 500, Consumer Discretionary stocks (cyclicals) surged (green arrow) over the last few weeks while Consumer Staple stocks declined (red arrow). Weakness in staples and strength in cyclicals bodes well for the market and the economy overall. In addition, the pattern looks like a large falling wedge and it would take a move above the June high to turn bullish on cyclicals again.
Taking this relationship one step further, we can see that Consumer Discretionary shares have recently started outperforming Consumer Staples shares. This price relative shows the Consumer Discretionary SPDR (XLY) relative to the Consumer Staple SPDR (XLP). Notice that XLY outperformed XLP from Feb-03 to Jan-04 and this coincided with stock market strength. In addition, XLY underperformed from Jan-04 to Aug-04 and this coincided with stock market weakness. Also notice the breakout in Apr-03 and the recent breakout in Sep-04. If this relationship is any guide, outperformance by XLY bodes well for the overall stock market.
Posted at 04:05 PM in Arthur Hill | Permalink
September 18, 2004A LONGER-TERM MARKET VIEWBy Chip Anderson
Carl Swenlin
Daily charts can be used to fine tune entry and exit points, but they should be interpreted within the context of what weekly charts and indicators tell us. For example, some shorter-term indicators show the market to be overbought, but the weekly chart implies that another leg of the bull market is just beginning.
At the beginning of this year the market began a corrective phase that lasted about eight months, climaxing with the shakeout selling into the August lows. As you can see on the chart, bull market correction often conclude when the price index dips below the moving averages. The fact that prices are now back above the moving averages (which are also rising), is a good sign that the correction is over.
Another good sign is that the Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO), which topped in overbought territory in the first quarter, has now bottomed near the zero line. You can see how the PMO remains above the zero line during bull market corrections -- in bull markets the zero line is an oversold level for the weekly PMO.
There is nothing not to like on this chart. A lengthy correction has been successfully concluded and the market environment is very positive. I have no opinion on how long or high the rally will go, but I assume it will last for at least a couple of months. We want to see the PMO continue to rise and cross above its 10-EMA. If the PMO turns down below its 10-EMA, it would be a strong sell signal.
Posted at 04:04 PM in Carl Swenlin | Permalink
September 18, 2004TIME TO SHORT TECH SHARES?By Chip Anderson
Richard Rhodes
The current Nasdaq Composite rally is at an �inflection point� much in the same manner it was during the week of July 14th as prices slid to new yearly lows. The simple indicator we are looking at is the 60-week moving average, which in the past has an enviable record as an inflection point. If prices breakout above this level, then higher prices will develop; however, if the 60-wma acts as resistance as we believe it shall given the declining 200-wma�then a larger decline will be underway. Thus, if one is inclined to be short technology shares�this is certainly the �best risk-adjusted� time in which to do so.
Posted at 04:03 PM in Richard Rhodes | Permalink
September 18, 2004BUZZING ABOUT MURPHYBy Chip Anderson
Site News
MURPHY SURVEY RESULTS - Last week we conducted a customer satisfaction survey for the Murphy Market Message. As a direct result of that survey, we've added a couple of new features to the "John Murphy" section of our site including a "Comments" box that allows Market Message subscribers to tell John how he's doing. The comments that readers have been sending in have helped John better target his recent articles to his audience. This results have been nothing short of spectacular. See the yellow box above for examples of what readers are now saying about the Murphy Market Message. Thanks to everyone that participated in the survey! DATA FEED STATUS - The performance of our new Thomson data feed has more than met our expectations. Even under the heavy load we experienced last week, there were no performance problems at all. In fact, we've been able to increase the speed of our Scan Engine updates and Market Summary pages significantly as a result.
There are still several data quality issues that we are pursuing with Thomson however. These include problems with market breadth indexes like $TICKQ and $TRIN as well as issues with our commodity indices. Intraday data spikes are also appearing more than we'd like.
Good progress is being made on all of these remaining issues however we will continue to press Thomson for solutions until everything is back to the way it was before the change-over.
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT - Here are several misconceptions that people had in our recent round of surveys:
"Let me pay by check." - We do, just use the form on this page. "Only 3 years of historical data." - We have data going back to 1990 for most stocks. See this FAQ article for details. "No cross-hairs to examine charts with." - Just click on the "Annotate" link below any SharpCharts, then click once on the "Change Info Mode" button. "Never heard back from you." - This is almost always due to poorly configured spam filters. Make sure that yours is letting message from StockCharts.com through. - "I was never able to login." - Over 70% of all login issues are due to people failing to type in the "@isp.com" part of their user ID.
Hopefully, this will help others avoid similar problems in the future.
HONORABLE MENTION FROM BARRON'S - Check it out!
"StockCharts.com makes its debut this year with an Honorable Mention for technical analysis, replacing ClearStation. We've always liked ClearStation's three-pronged approach to investing and its framework for the sharing of charts, but StockCharts.com more capably covers the nitty-gritty of technical analysis." - Barron's Online 9/13/2004
Wonder what took them so long? Considering that we've won the Reader's Choice award from "Stocks & Commodities" magazine for three straight years...
HEY! WHY AREN'T WE ON THE BALLOT? - Speaking of TASC, the balloting for the 2005 awards is currently open to TASC subscribers. Unfortunately, if you'd like to vote for us, you'll need to enter StockCharts.com as a write-in candidate in the "Subscription Internet Analytical Platforms" and "Technical Analysis Websites" categories. Click here to get started. Note: You don't have to vote in all the categories, only the ones you are familiar with.
We are deeply appreciative of everyone who votes for us in this important industry survey!
Posted at 04:02 PM in Site News | Permalink
September 18, 2004ON USING MOVING AVERAGESBy Chip Anderson
John Murphy
WHY WE USE MOVING AVERAGES ... You've probably noticed that I rely very heavily on moving average lines. There are some good reasons for that. The main one is that they are one of the simplest ways to spot trend changes. But not all moving averages are equal. The 50-day moving average, for example, is most useful in spotting "intermediate" trend changes which can last anywhere from one to three months. A 20-day moving average is better for spotting "short-term" trend changes which can last for days or weeks. The 200-day average helps determine the direction of the "long-term" trend of a market, which can last for months and even years. Of the three, the 200-day average carries the most weight. For timing purposes, however, the 20- and 50-day lines are more useful. My favorite is the 50-day line. While a crossing of the 20-day line gives an earlier trend signal, the crossing of the 50-day line suggests that the trend has more staying power. This is true for the timing of entry and exit points. Buy signals are given when the price crosses over a moving average line. In that sense, upside moving average crossings are good for buying purposes. Crossings below the moving average lines can be used for selling purposes. They're not perfect, but they are very helpful. Moving averages also provide good discipline. A simple rule to sell a stock that closes under its 50-day moving average can prevent a lot of losses.
USING THE 50-DAY AVERAGE ON GE... The next chart shows why I find the 50-day most useful. Since we're following GE today, let's compare the daily price of GE to its 50-day average for the last year. The blue line is the 50-day average. [That's computed by adding up the closes for the last 50 trading days and dividing the total by 50]. Buy signals are given when the price closes over the blue line (see green circles); sell signals are given when the stock closes below the blue line (see red circles). The first two buy signals were given last December and May. In both cases, the stock rose after that. The first sell signal was given during March. The stock fell heavily after that. [The signals don't always work out that well, but they did in the case of GE]. Let's examine the last two signals more closely and bring the 200-day average into play for GE.
COMBING MOVING AVERAGE LINES... The next chart examines the last two GE moving average "signals" and also shows why it's important to keep an eye on the 200-day average. GE gapped under its blue 50-day average in early August (see red circle). As it turns out, that wasn't a great signal. Notice, however, that GE stabilized above its (red) 200-day average (see red arrow). That suggested that the "long-term" trend was still up. Within two weeks of issuing a "sell" signal, GE crossed back over its 50-day line to issue a new "buy" signal. That signal is still in effect. Notice that GE never closed back under its 50-day line after issuing a buy signal. That's another test of a moving average signal. Once a market closes above a moving average, that line becomes a support level. If it closes under the moving average, the signal becomes suspect. The blue arrow in late August shows the stock dipping under the blue line "intra-day" before closing higher. Intra-day moves don't count. Only the "closes" matter. This example shows the strength and weakness of moving averages. They may cause occasional "whipsaws", but they help keep us on the right side of the market. That's why we use them and why I call your attention to markets that cross their 50- and 200-day averages. It's a simple way to alert you to potential trend changes. You can then examine the market more closely using other charting tools. For weekly charting, the 10-week average replaces the 50-day, and the 40-week replaces the 200-day.
Posted at 04:01 PM in John Murphy | Permalink
September 18, 2004Hello Fellow ChartWatchers!By Chip Anderson
Chip Anderson
We had some good response to last issues do-it-yourself approach to analyzing the Dow chart so let's try it again. Ready? Study the chart below and decided for yourself if it is bullish or bearish and why:
My take is that this chart looks pretty bearish right now. The index appears to be struggling with both the 200-day MA and the 10,300 resistance level. It put in a local top at 10,390 on Sept. 8th but quickly fell back below 10,300 and has moved sideways since then. Unfortunately, the Sept. 8th top is still well below the 10,487 top that appeared in June. That means that the index is still in an intermediate term downtrend - see the "Weekly View" on our Dow Jones Gallery Page for a clearer view of this trend.
The MACD momentum indicator has rolled over and is crossing back below its signal line. The price-and-volume-based CMF indicator has just moved back below zero confirming a short-term bearish stance. Finally, the 50-day MA remains far below the 200-day MA something that requires technicians adopt a bearish bias in their analysis.
Are there any bullish signs on the chart? Well, the 50-day MA is starting to turn up and the 200-day MA continues to rise however to majority of the technical signs point lower right now.
So how'd you do? Do you agree or disagree? Even if you don't agree, it is always instructive to compare your chart reading skills with someone else's. Hopefully this has helped.
For more technical opinions, keep reading! You'll find articles by John Murphy, Richard Rhodes, Carl Swenlin, and Arthur Hill in addition to the next installment in my continuing tour of "Murphy's Laws". Enjoy!
LAW #7: LEARN THE TURNS Law #7: Track oscillators. Oscillators help identify overbought and oversold markets. While moving averages offer confirmation of a market trend change, oscillators often help warn us in advance that a market has rallied or fallen too far and will soon turn. Two of the most popular are the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Stochastics. They both work on a scale of 0 to 100. With the RSI, readings over 70 are overbought while readings below 30 are oversold. The overbought and oversold values for Stochastics are 80 and 20. Most traders use 14-days or weeks for stochastics and either 9 or 14 days or weeks for RSI. Oscillator divergences often warn of market turns. These tools work best in a trading market range. Weekly signals can be used as filters on daily signals. Daily signals can be used as filters for intra-day charts. - John Murphy
John pretty much covered the key points in his description of Law #7. Here's an example of what he's talking about: First, notice that the RSI doesn't move from overbought to oversold as "wildly" as the Stochastics oscillator does - you'll rarely find an RSI reading above 90 or below 10 and your often find the RSI indicator near 50. On the other hand, the Stochastics Oscillator "loves" to swing quickly between readings below 10 and readings above 90 and it truly"hates" hanging around 50 - while it often reverses near there, it rarely stays near the center line for long.
Because the Stochastics Oscillator is so jumpy, we offer a "Slow" and a "Fast" version. The fast version is essentially the "raw" version of the oscillator. The slow version is simply the fast oscillator that has been smoothed some by running it through a Moving Average calculation. You can see on the chart above how the two lines are similar, but the "Slow STO" link is smoother.
I've added some annotations to the chart that point out one of the "Divergences" that John mentioned which warn of market turns. You can see where both of the Stochastic Oscillators put in a higher trough when AMZN was putting in a lower one. (The RSI was characteristically non-committal at the time.) Soon afterwards, the stock zoomed up 20+ percent. There's another divergence later on that same chart - see if you can spot it.
More Info:
This ChartSchool article has more on Oscillators in general.
If you want an excellent book on the subject, check out Chapter 10 of John's own "Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets".
For more on the RSI, check out the book "RSI - The Complete Guide" by John Hayden.
Note: John's entire 10 Laws of Technical Trading can be found in our "ChartSchool" area under "Trading Strategies". If you missed any of my previous articles on Murphy's Laws, the ChartWatchers Archives page will take you to any of them.
Posted at 04:00 PM in Chip Anderson | Permalink
September 05, 2004A "NEW AND IMPROVED" RYDEX RATIOBy Chip Anderson
Carl Swenlin
The Rydex Asset Ratio has been around for eight or ten years, and it is a favorite among sentiment indicators because it is based, not upon opinion polls, but upon where people are actually putting their money. It is calculated by dividing total assets in bear index and money market funds by the total assets in bull index and sector funds.
Recently Decision Point introduced the Rydex Cash Flow Ratio. It uses the same basic formula, but, instead of total assets, it uses Cumulative Cash Flow (CCFL) totals for the same funds. To determine CCFL we calculate daily net cash flow, which is the actual cash entering and leaving each fund in the Rydex group of funds. This is done by calculating the amount that total assets in a fund should have changed based upon the percentage change of the net asset value (NAV) per share, assuming that no cash was added to or taken out of the fund. We then subtract this amount from the actual amount of total assets in the fund, and the result is the daily net cash flow. We keep a cumulative total of the daily net cash flow. Total asset value tells us how much money is in the fund. Cumulative Cash Flow tells us how much cash was actually moved in or out of the fund.
We think that the Rydex Cash Flow Ratio is a dramatic improvement over the Rydex Asset Ratio, because it uses an estimate of the amount of money that has been committed to bull and bear funds, making it a more accurate reflection of the actual underlying psychological forces that are affecting market participants.
On the chart below we can see that the Cash Flow Ratio shows more rational and consistent levels of support and resistance. And we can see that the Cash Flow Ratio is able to maintain a fairly well-defined trading range for extended periods.
It is really striking how the Cash Flow Ratio has clearly detected the true state of sentiment during 2002 through 2004. For example, we can see a sharp rise in bullish sentiment coming off the March 2003 price lows. Then by May 2003 we can see sentiment peak and begin to turn bearish. I remember because I was there. People didn't believe that a bull market had begun. They became progressively more bearish in June and July, and, when the market had a small shakeout in August 2003, the Cash Flow Ratio was as bearish as it had been in March 2003. While that may not seem reasonable based upon price movement, I think it is an accurate expression of how sentiment "felt" at the time.
Also, note how the Ratio trading range shifts downward at the beginning of 2003. This was caused by a large chunk of money moving into bear funds as the market headed down into it's final low before the bull market launched. Bearishness reached a feverish pitch at that time and it permanently altered the trading range. This could happen again in either direction if sentiment is strong enough.
Finally, we can see that the recent levels of bearishness at the August 2004 price lows are the same as they were in March and August 2003. In my opinion, this is strong evidence that a medium-term price low was reached at that point.
Posted at 04:04 PM in Carl Swenlin | Permalink
September 05, 2004SEMIS NOT THE LEADERS THEY ONCE WEREBy Chip Anderson
Richard Rhodes
The recent carnage in the Semiconductor Index (SOX) moved to the forefront on Friday with INTC’s poor guidance moving forward. Thus, we must look at the SOX within the context of its relationship with the S&P 500 (SPX), and for this we use the ratio of the two Quite simply, we could very well see s a short-term bottom in the ratio in the days or weeks ahead – but it certainly isn’t within a historical context “the bottom” we would feel comfortable buying into on a longer-term basis. Our momentum indicators are now oversold, but it has paid to wait until a “positive divergence’ forms prior to becoming aggressively long this sector…which will require many months.
Bottom Line: We don’t expect the semiconductors to be “the leaders: on rallies as they once were.
Posted at 04:03 PM in Richard Rhodes | Permalink
September 05, 2004NEW DATA FEED IS IN!By Chip Anderson
Site News
OUR NEW DATA FEED IS IN! - Well, there were some bumps in the road, but we've managed to get our new ThomsonONE data feed installed and working last week. To those of you that were patient with us while we fixed the problems, we say "Thanks!" Your understanding and clear problem reports were very helpful.
Because of the problems that occurred, we have added one free week of service to every StockCharts.com member that logged in to their charting account last week. Everyone who qualifies for this offer should have already had this additional time added to their account.
Finally, let me reiterate something that many people missed about this data feed change. We were forced to make this change due to circumstances beyond our control. Our old data feed company was bought-out by Thomson Financial several years ago. This year, Thomson decided to discontinue their support for that old feed and migrate us to their own "premier" feed called ThomsonONE. The people at Thomson have worked very hard to help us with this transition. Most of the problems that occurred happened due to things that no one could have foreseen. We truly expect that this new data feed will prove to be far superior to the old one as time goes on.
Again, a company like ours almost never changes data feeds. It has taken a huge amount of time and effort on our part to pull it off and it has delayed the roll out of the various site improvements that we want to make. Fortunately, the odds that we'll have to do this again are almost nil. We apologize for the recent problems but rest assured that with this transition behind us, StockCharts.com will only improve in the future.
SPECIAL NOTE TO AOL USERS - A recent policy change at AOL means that if you accidentally mark our "ChartWatchers" notification email messages as "Spam" in your AOL Mailbox, you will automatically be unsubscribed from all of our mailing lists. If you want to continue receiving notification messages from StockCharts.com, make sure to "Delete" those messages rather than marking them as "Spam."
NEW BOOKSTORE BOOKS - We've been busy adding more technical analysis books to our online bookstore. Be sure to check out our New Additions page at least once a week to get the latest scoop on what's new at StockCharts Books!
|
Posted at 04:02 PM in Site News | Permalink
September 05, 2004TELECOMM HAVE STRONG DAYSBy Chip Anderson
John Murphy
Telecom stocks had a good chart day. The AMEX Telecom iShares (IYZ) broke out to a new six-month high today. Its relative strength line has been rising since late June. Two of the biggest reasons for today's strength were SBC and Verizon Communications which are two of the biggest holdings in the ETF. SBC rose to the highest level in seven months. Verizon ended the day at a new 52-week high. Both relative strength lines have been jumping for the last two months.
Posted at 04:01 PM in John Murphy | Permalink
September 05, 2004Hello Fellow ChartWatchers!By Chip Anderson
Chip Anderson
Thursday's big rally for the Dow Industrials was unexpected and significant. Check out the chart below and see if you can spot the reasons why:
As anticipated, the Dow faltered after hitting its 50-day moving average line. That line was also at the 10,200 resistance level marked by the peak in late July and so the odds of a reversal there were pretty good. Sure enough, the Dow started moving lower on Monday, but rallies on Tuesday and Wednesday re-tested the resistance level and Thursday's big follow-up pushed things well clear. The MACD line moved into positive territory and the Chaikin Money Flow moved back into the green.
The Dow is now testing its 200-day MA and eyeing the next higher resistance area between 10,350 and 10,450. That's where it ran into problems back in June. In order to officially reverse the long-term downtrend that the Dow is in, it needs to move above the high of 10,487 set on June 25th. The next couple of weeks should be very interesting...
In the mean time, check out John Murphy's thoughts on the Telecomm sector, Richard Rhodes' look at Semiconductor stocks, Carl Swenlin's views of the Rydex Ratio and the next installment in my continuing tour of "Murphy's Laws".
LAW #6: FOLLOW THAT AVERAGE Law #6: Follow moving averages. Moving averages provide objective buy and sell signals. They tell you if existing trend is still in motion and help confirm a trend change. Moving averages do not tell you in advance, however, that a trend change is imminent. A combination chart of two moving averages is the most popular way of finding trading signals. Some popular futures combinations are 4- and 9-day moving averages, 9- and 18-day, 5- and 20-day. Signals are given when the shorter average line crosses the longer. Price crossings above and below a 40-day moving average also provide good trading signals. Since moving average chart lines are trend-following indicators, they work best in a trending market. - John Murphy
A couple of weeks ago, we looked at trends and trendlines. We talked about how trendlines are line "non-horizontal" support/resistance levels. Well, think of moving average lines are like "flexible" trendlines. They help you see the trend that's "hidden" amongst all the noisy short-term price fluctuations. Unfortunately, unlike trendlines and resistance levels, there are an unlimited variety of moving averages that you could look at. There's the 50-day MA, the 200-day MA, the 20-day MA, the 9-day MA, etc. Going beyond that, there are Simple Moving Averages (SMAs) and Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs) (and still others beyond those!). How do you choose? The general rule is simple - the longer your time horizon, the longer the MA period you should use. Are you a buy-and-hold investor? Use longer term MAs like the 50-day and 200-day ones that I like to write about. Are you a day trader? Use shorter term MAs like the 4-day and 9-day ones that John mentioned. Note however that while longer-term investors can generally ignore short-term MAs , the reverse is not true. Even day-traders should be aware of where important long-term MA levels are. Resistance from the 200-day MA can impact day traders too. The help see how different MAs work, I often look at something I call an "MA Ribbon Chart". It contains a series of MAs - each with a slightly different period setting: As John mentions in Law #6, MA Crossover signals can be very useful in trending markets. That where you focus on the points where two different MAs intersect. When the shorter MA moves above the longer MA, a "buy" signal is given. When the shorter MA moved below the longer MA, a "sell" signal is given. Here are some examples: As you can see, shorter MAs periods lead to more signals. You'll need to take some initiative here and experiment to see what combination fits your trading goals and style. Fortunately, StockCharts.com makes it very easy to try whatever combinations you want.
Finally, don't forget to watch the 50 and 200-day MAs. Why? Because lots of other people watch them and thus, they often act like important support and resistance zones.
Next week: Law #7 - Learn the Turns |